By Sefa Yürükel
Despite decades having passed since the end of the Cold War, the European continent continues to subordinate its security architecture to the decision making and command hierarchy of a transatlantic centre. Yet this state of dependency, rather than serving Europe’s collective interests, has turned it into a passive vehicle for geopolitical tensions that unfold on a global scale and often develop beyond its own will. The Washington centred strategic decision making processes have produced outcomes that escalate tension in Europe’s natural neighbourhood basin, undermine energy security and squander opportunities for economic integration. In this framework, the separation of European states from the NATO umbrella and their unification around a strategically independent European Defence Army that they will build among themselves will not only place the continent’s security on a sovereign footing but will also bring a responsible and balancing actor of the multipolar world onto the stage of history.
The Strategic Impasses of Atlantic Dependency
The European security architecture shaped under the NATO framework, rather than bringing deterrence and stability to the continent’s states, has been the source of strategic impasses that have deepened over decades. The foremost of these impasses is the fact that Europe’s defence expenditures and military planning are largely indexed to the global priorities of the United States. NATO’s waves of enlargement have drawn Europe into a zero sum geopolitical rivalry with Russia; the continent’s energy supply security, trade corridors and diplomatic room for manoeuvre have been unable to exceed the boundaries drawn by Washington. In crisis zones stretching from the Balkans to Ukraine, from the Eastern Mediterranean to the Sahel, European states have often been forced to act as subcontractors implementing not their own interests but the strategic preferences of the transatlantic ally. This asymmetrical dependency has blunted Europe’s ability to be a security subject in its own right and has reduced the continent to a vast military market and logistics base incapable of displaying independent will in its relations with the rest of the world.
The European Defence Army as the Founding Element of Strategic Independence
The sole way out of this dependency cycle for Europe lies in leaving NATO and building its own unique defence structure. The European Defence Army, to be jointly established by the united countries, is not merely a military integration project but also a strategic leap that fuses the continent’s political will, industrial capacity and diplomatic vision in the same melting pot. This army must go beyond being a simple sum of existing national armies; it must be equipped with a joint command structure, a common defence doctrine, an integrated logistics system and a Europe centred defence industry ecosystem. Such a structuring will free Europe from dependence on US military technologies and NATO’s standardisation impositions and will allow the continent to define its own threat perceptions within the framework of its own strategic culture. The European Defence Army is also a rationalisation project that will reduce duplicative defence expenditures within the continent, create economies of scale and multiply Europe’s collective deterrence capacity.
The Geopolitical Imperative of Being a Balancing Element in the World
The establishment of an independent European Defence Army is not merely a regional matter concerning the continent’s security but also a paradigm shift that will directly affect global stability. Today’s world is shaped under the shadow of an increasingly sharpening US China rivalry, and the tension between these two giant powers is forcing all medium sized actors to take sides. A unified Europe with strategic independence is precisely the sole structure that can, at this point, step in as a balancing global power without engaging one of the parties. With its economic size, diplomatic traditions, technological capacity and military potential, Europe does not have to be either an unconditional extension of the Atlantic camp or a passive partner of Asia centred formations. A Europe possessing its own defence army and independent decision making mechanisms can position itself as a mediator, stabiliser and promoter of multilateral cooperation in all crisis zones stretching from Africa to the Middle East, from South Asia to Latin America. This positioning will save the world from being condemned to a bipolar deadlock and will lay the groundwork for the establishment of a truly multipolar and balanced international system.
The Historic Opportunity Before Europe
Europe’s leaving NATO and establishing an independent defence army is not a utopian vision of the future but a strategic necessity imposed by the current conjuncture. The weariness of the transatlantic security architecture, the US’s gradual shift of strategic focus to the Asia Pacific and the rising demands for strategic autonomy in European public opinion are preparing a favourable ground for this transformation. The European states’ seizing of this opportunity will end the tutelage relationship that has persisted for decades and make the continent a subject of history. Otherwise, Europe will be condemned to remain a geography squeezed ever more tightly between two great powers, incapable of either securing its own security or having a voice in global affairs. The destiny of a United Europe does not lie in waiting as a passive ally under the NATO umbrella but in taking its place as an independent and balancing power in the world by establishing its own army.
Conclusion
By virtue of its economic power, human capital, technological infrastructure and political experience, the European continent possesses more than enough of all the qualifications required to become an independent defence actor on a global scale. What is lacking is the political will to mobilise these qualifications and the courage to break the Atlantic dependency. Leaving NATO and establishing a strategically independent European Defence Army will not only place the continent’s security on a sovereign foundation but will also bring about the birth of a balancing element that will pull the world back from the brink of polarisation. This step is the sole path for Europe to take ownership of its own future, to assume its place on the stage of history as an independent international actor and to become one of the responsible architects of the multipolar world order.
References
Howorth, J. (2007). Security and Defence Policy in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mérand, F. (2008). European Defence Policy: Beyond the Nation State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Posen, B. R. (2006). “European Union Security and Defense Policy: Response to Unipolarity?” Security Studies, 15(2), 149-186.
Shea, J. (2018). “NATO at 70: An Alliance in Crisis.” Survival, 60(3), 17-34.
Toje, A. (2010). The European Union as a Small Power: After the Post-Cold War. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Walt, S. M. (2018). The Hell of Good Intentions: America’s Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of U.S. Primacy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Witney, N. (2019). “European Strategic Autonomy: Ambition, Reality and the Way Forward.” European Council on Foreign Relations, Policy Brief, 1-15.
Zielonka, J. (2014). Is the EU Doomed?. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Sefa Yürükel
Danish ethnographer and social anthropologist (MA)
Aarhus University, 1997
Independent Researcher
Fields of Research: International Politics, Public International Law, Geopolitics, Sociology, Psychology, Cultural Studies, Systems and Structures.
Bir yanıt yazın