By Sefa Yürükel
The European continent has risen since the second half of the twentieth century as a uniquely prosperous space and a project of peace on a global scale. Yet despite decades having passed since the end of the Cold War, this project has not been able to write a success story of the same magnitude in terms of political sovereignty and strategic independence. Europe today is experiencing the gravest leadership crisis in its history; the absence of visionary, charismatic and independent political figures across the continent has left decision making processes wide open to the influence of a transatlantic centre. Strategic priorities shaped in Washington penetrate the continent’s domestic politics, economic orientation and security architecture through the agency of European elites, a situation that presents us with a new model of mandate rule that can be described as an updated form of classical colonialism. A Europe left leaderless is losing its sovereignty under the domination of transatlantic interests; the ancient peoples of the continent are being dragged along a geopolitical route they have not chosen themselves.
The Structural Causes of Leaderlessness
The leadership crisis in which Europe finds itself today is not a coincidental situation but the result of systematic political engineering spanning decades. Throughout the Cold War period, the transatlantic power systematically marginalised figures in Europe who possessed the potential to display an independent political will; as in the case of Charles de Gaulle, quests for strategic autonomy were punished. European integration gradually turned into a mechanism that eroded national leaderships and subordinated charismatic politics to bureaucratic engineering. The Brussels centred institutional structure has dried up the continent’s leadership pool through an operation that dampens political excitement and the popular will, exalts grey compromises and rewards mediocrity. Within this structural framework, Europe is unable to produce leaders befitting its civilisational heritage, economic power and human wealth; the rare independent voices that do emerge are neutralised by Atlantic centred media and political networks. Leaderlessness is not Europe’s fate; it persists as a conscious choice of circles that desire the continent to remain dependent.
The Role of Americanist Elites in the Mandate Structure
The Atlanticist elites in Europe are the most critical actors sustaining the dependency relationship between the continent and Washington. These elites, positioned in think tanks, media outlets, university chairs and bureaucratic ranks, operate a narrative machine that subordinates Europe’s strategic interests to the global objectives of the United States. The questioning of transatlantic ties is coded almost as a heresy by these circles; quests for strategic independence are stigmatised as populism, extremism or succumbing to Russian and Chinese influence. The essential function of these elites is to suppress the genuine security and prosperity demands of European peoples through a discourse of transatlantic loyalty. In every field, from energy policies to defence procurement, from trade routes to diplomatic engagements, it is not Europe’s national interests but the strategic priorities of the transatlantic ally that prove decisive. This form of relationship, even if it is not based on direct territorial occupation and the planting of flags, constitutes a new generation model of mandate rule in the sense that political decision making processes are determined from outside.
The Economic and Strategic Cost of Mandate Rule
This Atlantic centred mandate structure is generating an increasingly compounding cost on the European economy and security. On the economic front, Europe, compelled to comply with the sanction regimes imposed by the United States, is paying the price of being cut off from Russian energy through the collapse of heavy industry, astronomical rises in energy prices and a loss of competitive strength. While European economies are deprived of cheap Russian energy and vast Asian markets, American energy companies and the defence industry are reaping record profits from this situation. On the strategic front, NATO’s waves of enlargement and the escalated tension with Russia have turned Europe into a continent incapable of controlling its own security, condemned to transatlantic decisions. The prolongation of the war in Ukraine, the undermining of peace initiatives and the chronicisation of the conflict serve the interests not of Europe but of transatlantic strategists. The peoples of Europe are paying the cost of this mandate structure through inflation, unemployment, deindustrialisation and, worst of all, the rekindled flames of war in the east of the continent; in return, the Atlanticist elites prescribe more militarisation and more dependency to conceal their failure.
What Is to Be Done? A Roadmap to Independence for Europe
The steps that Europe must take to free itself from this mandate structure lie above all in structural reforms requiring political will and popular support. The first step is for the peoples of Europe to dismantle the Atlanticist elites through democratic means. This is a comprehensive political renewal process that begins at the ballot box but must continue by breaking the transatlantic influence within the media and think tanks. The second step is for Europe to rebuild its own strategic mind and leadership capacity. Independent think tanks, Europe centred media networks, research institutions that prioritise the common interests of the continent and, most importantly, democratic mechanisms to protect the popular will against the Brussels bureaucracy must be established. The third step is the realisation of a European Defence Army. This army should not be a complement to NATO but a Europe centred command structure with sovereign decision making processes that will take its place. The fourth step is for Europe to free its energy and trade policies from transatlantic impositions and to establish balanced and sovereign relations with the rising economic corridors of Eurasia. The fifth and final step is for Europe to develop an independent diplomatic profile as an advocate of global peace. The continent must act not as the side of Washington, Moscow or Beijing but as a principled defender of multilateralism, international law and peaceful coexistence.
Conclusion
The European continent possesses an ancient civilisational heritage distilled through centuries of wars, destructions and rebirths. This heritage is too valuable to be squandered under the mandate rule of a transatlantic power. Leaderlessness is not Europe’s fate but an impasse that must be confronted with courage. The dependency order constructed by Americanist elites can only be dismantled through the democratic awakening of the peoples and the reestablishment of a sovereign political will. What Europe must do is clear: to cultivate independent leaders, to establish its own strategic mind, to build its own defence force, to determine its own energy and trade routes and to rise as an independent guarantor of peace in the world. This path is arduous, yet it is both possible and imperative to walk it. Europe will either embark on this path of its own volition or it will remain in the dusty pages of history as the sorrowful memory of a civilisation that lost its independence.
References
De Gaulle, C. (1970). Discours et Messages: Vers le Terme 1966-1969. Paris: Plon.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
Howorth, J. (2007). Security and Defence Policy in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Judt, T. (2005). Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945. New York: Penguin Press.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Todd, E. (2003). After the Empire: The Breakdown of the American Order. New York: Columbia University Press.
Witney, N. (2019). “European Strategic Autonomy: Ambition, Reality and the Way Forward.” European Council on Foreign Relations, Policy Brief, 1-15.
Zielonka, J. (2014). Is the EU Doomed?. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Sefa Yürükel
Danish ethnographer and social anthropologist (MA)
Aarhus University, 1997
Independent Researcher
Fields of Research: International Politics, Public International Law, Geopolitics, Sociology, Psychology, Cultural Studies, Systems and Structures.
Bir yanıt yazın