Category: Authors

  • Letter to Pakistani Ambassador to United Nations

    Letter to Pakistani Ambassador to United Nations

    Letter to Pakistani Ambassador to United Nations / Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC)

    His Excellence Ambassador Asim Iftikhar Ahmad
    Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the United Nations
    Pakistan Mission to The United Nations. 

    8 East, 65th Street 
    New York, NY 10065

    April 10, 2025 

    Dear Ambassador Asim Iftikhar Ahmad,

    I extend to you my warmest congratulations on your appointment as the Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan to the United Nations. Sir, My name is Ibrahim Kurtulus , I am a Turkish American Community Activist. Ambassador, Your elevation to this distinguished post is a testament to your unwavering dedication, diplomatic acumen, and tireless service to your nation on the international stage. The Republic of Türkiye and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan share a bond that transcends the boundaries of geography and politics. It is a brotherhood rooted in history, fortified by shared values, and deepened by unwavering mutual respect. From the final days of the Ottoman Empire to the present era of the Republic of Türkiye, the Turkish nation has never forgotten the heartfelt solidarity shown by our Pakistani brothers and sisters.

    Indeed, this history is not merely preserved in books it is passed from generation to generation. My own daughters, aged 13 and 10, have already come to understand the depth of Pakistan’s support for Türkiye. Just as 90 million citizens of Türkiye remember with gratitude the sacrifices and moral support extended by your great nation during our most trying times, our children will continue to educate theirs on this sacred bond of friendship and brotherhood.

    Today, we continue to witness this unwavering spirit of solidarity not only in the context of Türkiye but also in the principled stance your country has taken towards the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). While others have chosen the path of silence and isolation, Pakistan has demonstrated moral clarity and brotherhood. The Turkish people recognize and deeply appreciate this courageous and just approach. Just as Pakistan has stood by Türkiye and the TRNC, we in Türkiye stand in resolute solidarity with our Kashmiri brothers and sisters, and with the noble people of Pakistan. The issue of Jammu and Kashmir remains close to the hearts of the Turkish people. We know too well that any attack direct or indirect on the sovereignty or dignity of Pakistan is felt by the Turkish people as an affront to their own.

    Your Excellency, as you embark upon your important mission at the United Nations, may your tenure be marked by success, wisdom, and strengthened cooperation between our brotherly nations. Türkiye looks forward to continuing our close collaboration on matters of mutual concern, from promoting global peace to defending the just causes of our nations and peoples.

    Once again, I offer you my heartfelt congratulations and look forward, Inshallah, to the honor of meeting you in the near future.

    With profound respect and warm regards,

    Respectfully,

    Ibrahim Kurtulus 

    Community Activist 

    New York, Staten Island 

  • The Moral Collapse of the Modern World: Humanity Lost Between Imperialism, Religious Domination, and Cults of Leadership

    The Moral Collapse of the Modern World: Humanity Lost Between Imperialism, Religious Domination, and Cults of Leadership

    By Sefa Yürükel

    Every era has its darkness; sometimes it comes with war, sometimes with famine, and at times with moral decay. Today, however, this darkness has stripped away all its masks and stands before us with a single face: Corrupt politics, unconscious societies, and systematic ignorance. Across the world, people seek salvation in new tyrants and hope in old lies; while those who raise the voice of truth are silenced, forgotten, or discredited.

    In countries like Turkey—which has yet to complete its modernization journey, caught between secularism and traditional religiosity, both enamored with and enraged by the West—this darkness is felt more intensely. Imagine a country that once established a modern Republic, envisioned a future based on reason, science, and equality, only to later trample those gains beneath the feet of religion, ignorance, and self-interest. Atatürk’s silhouette remains, but his spirit is in exile. Secularism is a signboard, hollow in meaning. This is not just irony; it is a society losing its connection to its own conscience.

    1. Political Perspective: The Moral Collapse of Power and the Shadow of Imperial Mindsets Over Leadership

    Today, leadership is no longer about representing the people, but about directing them. From Erdoğan to Trump, from Macron to Zelensky, many modern leaders are loyal to the new codes of global politics—not representing peace, but domination; not the people, but interests. These leaders no longer seek to understand their people but to reprogram them. Because to understand the people is to carry their pain, and that threatens the comfort of power.

    In Turkey, the situation is a deeper and more intimate tragedy. The rational legacy of a leader like Atatürk has become nothing more than a display piece; while power manipulates people through the grip of religion, even the opposition has surrendered to the language of this system. Everyone wants to “be in power,” but no one wants to “be justice.” As those elected grow distant from the people, yet still claim to speak for them, politics becomes theater, and democracy a pagan ritual.

    In this system, truth-tellers are punished, and those who speak rightly are declared enemies. Because truth is the enemy of the status quo. Just as Socrates was silenced with hemlock, today it is not the most knowledgeable but the most obedient who are valued. Yet the oldest call of philosophy still echoes in our ears: Know thyself. But no one is interested in knowing themselves; everyone prefers to blame others and cover their own ignorance with someone else’s sins.

    1. Psychological Perspective: Collective Trauma and Learned Helplessness

    When a society’s memory is erased, its soul is crippled. In countries like Turkey, shaped by layers of historical traumas, the collective psyche is not just melancholic but governed by an organized system of denial and suppression. The traumas of the past—coups, shortages, oppression, and most of all, the systematic destruction of hope—have been coded into the subconscious of the public as a kind of helplessness. This code does not lead to the creation of a new order, but to the legitimization of existing disorder.

    Learned helplessness refers to when individuals stop trying after repeated failures, believing effort is futile. In Turkey, this concept has infiltrated society as a whole. Empty-sounding but ideologically weighty phrases like “Nothing will change,” “They’re all the same,” “We’re hopeless,” slowly erode the belief in personal agency—making this narrative one of the strongest allies of authoritarian rule. Because hopeful people question things, and those who question are a threat.

    In this psychological climate, true heroes are forgotten while fake saviors are glorified. Atatürk becomes a statue, a picture, a poster… but never a system of thought or a method of resistance. People comfort themselves with symbols while the content of truth decays. The modern Turkish individual carries an image of Atatürk in their mind, but this Atatürk is no longer a figure of history—only a quiet aphorism used to silence their own conscience. His call for “generations free in thought, free in conscience, and free in knowledge” is no longer an educational policy but a nostalgic lament.

    The cruelest part of trauma is that it teaches silence. Speak, and you’ll be isolated. Resist, and you’ll be rejected. Question, and you’ll be branded a “traitor.” This psychological pressure leads people to deny their moral existence—even normalize evil as they experience it. And so, the people fall in love with their executioners.

    1. Cultural Perspective: A Crisis of Identity Between Secularism and Religiosity

    Culture is the mirror of a society. But sometimes, that mirror breaks. In countries like Turkey—caught between the winds of both East and West, walking under both the crescent moon and the light of modernity—this broken mirror reflects only distorted images. Not fully religious, not fully secular; not fully modern, not fully traditional… Everything is partial, hybrid, ambiguous. And this ambiguity has ceased to be an identity—it has become a burden.

    Secularism in this land is not an ideal but an accusation. To be “secular” is seen as to be “godless,” because the concepts have been hollowed out, and values either demonized or trivialized. Yet secularism is not just the separation of religion and state; it is the liberation of thought. The right to believe without fear, and equally, the right to not believe without fear. And this right is protected not by defending secularism, but by living its meaning.

    However, in Turkey, secularism has been reduced to elite behavior—detached from the people. On the other hand, religion has ceased to be a matter of morality and become a tool for politics and identity warfare. Mosques are turned into political arenas; pulpits become campaign stages. Faith is no longer a matter of conscience, but an identity test: Not who is more devout, but who is more flamboyant.

    This cultural entrapment, when merged with societal trauma, produces a population full of contradictions—yet so numbed it fails to even notice the irony. We imitate the West while demonizing it. We praise Atatürk while betraying his principles. We cling to religion while drifting further from ethics.

    Cultural identity is no longer a compass—it’s a storm. We no longer know where we’re headed; we simply follow the wind. And the wind, now, is no longer the people’s breath—it is the breath of power.

    1. Sociological Perspective: Willful Ignorance, Crowd Psychology, and Media Domination

    Ignorance is not a deficiency—it is a system. Blocking access to information, making critical thought a luxury, and equating inquiry with “terror”… These are not governance mistakes; they are methods of rule. In Turkey, ignorance is not accidental; it is a meticulously constructed political project. A policy of ignorance that changes faces each decade, but never its essence: not to educate the people, but to render them governable.

    Sociologically, all structures that obstruct individual access to information—such as the degradation of the education system, the monopolization of media, and the criminalization of alternative thought—are tools to transform a society into a crowd. Because the individual thinks, but the crowd believes. And believing crowds do not question. They accept whatever is said, embrace whatever is imposed. Intelligence is no longer prized—loyalty is.

    Media is the most effective weapon of this order. The most powerful propaganda of the modern world is broadcast, not printed. People no longer read books—they read subtitles. It’s no longer about discussion but about hashtags. Every evening, the public mind is fed with the same sentences, the same faces, the same fears. Reality is shattered, perception is rebuilt. People start seeing enemies as friends and friends as enemies.

    Ignorance is not merely the absence of knowledge; it is mistaking the false for the true, presenting darkness as light. Today, much of the population sees their oppressors as heroes and their colonizers as saviors. Because an unconscious society always deems the loudest right, and the most fearsome strong. That’s why truth isn’t heard—because it doesn’t shout. It is silenced, buried.

    This sociological structure strips the people of their agency over their own future. Elections are held, but there is no real choice. Debates are conducted, but there are no real ideas. There is democracy, but no people. Only a crowd. And a crowd that learns to live without awakening, never wants to wake again.

    1. Anthropological Perspective: Leader Cults, Ritualized Politics, and Modern Idolatry

    Humanity has always lived with a need to believe. This need is fed not only by religion, but by every ideology, every figure, every ritual that replaces it. Today, belief systems are no longer read from holy books, but from screens, podiums, and public squares. Leaders are not prophets—but they are mythologized figures in the public consciousness: saviors, fathers, even gods. This is the dangerous edge where politics becomes indistinguishable from idolatry.

    Modern leaders no longer simply govern—they dominate, they are sanctified, they become untouchable. Their words are law, their gaze mercy, their anger justice. From Erdoğan to Trump, Putin to Netanyahu, many leaders promise not hope but faith. And instead of critique, people offer worship. Because that which is believed in is not questioned. Political loyalty thus becomes a form of worship, not thought—a cult of identity, not citizenship.

    Ritualized politics is the ceremony of this worship. State ceremonies, campaign rallies, repeated leader imagery—all idealize the same figure in the public mind. People no longer think—they repeat. They do not understand—they believe. They do not vote—they offer loyalty. This is the moment when political identity is lost and replaced by communal consciousness. Politics is no longer a space for public debate but a venue for sacred rituals.

    Anthropologically, this shows that modern communities are composed not of individuals, but of devout collectives. Even in a republic founded on secularism, religious rhetoric and leader-worship dominate. This structure represents the sanctification of the non-sacred. True leadership is not about seizing the people’s minds—it is about setting them free. But the people have long forgotten freedom. They now mistake their chains for bracelets.

    Modern idols are no longer made of stone—they are built from propaganda. They are not erected in squares—they are installed in minds. And to topple them, revolution is not necessary—awakening is. But awakening requires courage, the willingness to be alone, and the re-learning of how to think. That is why people fear not breaking their idols—but even touching them.

    Conclusion: Is the Reconstruction of Morality, Truth, and Hope Still Possible?

    The question is no longer, “How did we end up like this?” but “How do we get out of this?” Because time does not only leave marks; it also offers the chance to erase them or write new ones atop them. Today, the world stands at a crossroads: on one side, silence in the name of truth; on the other, frenzy in the name of ignorance. And we are travelers between these two darknesses, having lost our sight.

    In Turkey, this darkness is more intense, more layered. For in this land, there was once a leader who preached reason to his people, who stood for independence against colonialism, and enlightenment against fanaticism: Atatürk. He was not a name, but an idea. But we loved the name, not the idea. We remembered him instead of embodying him. We missed him instead of understanding him. And now, nostalgia gives way to disappointment.

    The modern world’s true illness is not economic collapse, environmental disaster, or political decay. The real collapse is the devaluation of morality, humanity, and conscience. We live in a time where everyone knows everything, but no one feels anything. Where being right is punished and having a conscience is a burden. Worst of all: we got used to it.

    But hope, like darkness, is contagious. Every true word, every brave stance, every open conscience is a ripple against that numbness. Perhaps it won’t be grand revolutions—but small awakenings that change everything. Perhaps a single article, a single sentence, a single person choosing not to stay silent…

    Throughout history, societies have often forgotten the truth. But each time, someone reminded them. Socrates drank hemlock, but was never silenced—he still speaks centuries later. Atatürk died, but his idea was never buried. And you, the one reading these words: If you do not forget, if you do not stay silent, this darkness will not be permanent.

    Truth has always belonged to the few. And the few have always been the essence of history.

    So let us return to the beginning:
    In this world, it is hard to remain good.
    It is burdensome to remain just.
    But that is exactly what makes it meaningful.

  • Letter to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio

    Letter to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio

    US  Secretary of State Marco Rubio

    U.S. Department of State
    2201 C Street NW
    Washington, DC 20520
    United States

    April 5, 2025 

    Honorable Secretary of State

    I write to address the so called concerns raised by American citizens of Greek heritage and Philhellenes

    regarding the Republic of Türkiye and to provide a factual and balanced perspective that counters misleading narratives and unjustified accusations against our NATO ally. The argument against Türkiye’s procurement of F-35 fighter jets is based on outdated rhetoric, mischaracterizations of Turkish policies, and a failure to acknowledge Türkiye’s indispensable role in regional and global security.

    1. Türkiye’s Commitment to Counterterrorism and Regional Stability

    The assertion that Türkiye harbors or supports terrorist organizations is categorically false. As a nation that has suffered immensely from terrorism, Türkiye has been at the forefront of the fight against groups such as ISIS, the PKK/YPG, and other extremist elements. Contrary to the claims made, Türkiye has actively dismantled terrorist networks and conducted military operations to secure its borders and protect civilian populations.

    On Hamas: Türkiye has engaged with Hamas as part of its diplomatic efforts to promote regional stability, much like other states in the region, including Qatar and Egypt. Diplomatic engagement does not equate to material support. Moreover, the recent normalization of Türkiye-Israel relations, including intelligence-sharing agreements, demonstrates Türkiye’s pragmatic approach rather than hostility toward Israel.

    On Hezbollah: There is no factual basis to claim that Türkiye has exhibited “sympathy” toward Hezbollah. Türkiye has maintained a consistent position against Iran-backed militant groups that threaten regional security.

    2. Türkiye’s Right to Defend Its Borders and Counter the PKK/YPG Threat

    The claim that Türkiye’s military operations in Syria constitute aggression against U.S. allies ignores key realities:

    The PKK is a U.S.-designated terrorist organization. The YPG, its Syrian branch, has been armed and supported under the guise of counter-ISIS operations. However, it continues to attack Turkish cities and civilians.

    Türkiye has conducted counterterrorism operations in full compliance with international law and the right to self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter. No sovereign nation would tolerate terror threats emanating from its borders.

    The argument conveniently omits that Türkiye was the only NATO country to engage in direct combat against ISIS in Syria, including the liberation of key cities such as al-Bab and Jarabulus, saving thousands of lives.

    3. Türkiye’s NATO Commitment and Relations with Russia

    Accusations that Türkiye has failed to impose sanctions on Russia ignore the complexity of Türkiye’s geopolitical position and strategic autonomy. It is important to note:

    Türkiye has supplied Ukraine with Bayraktar TB2 drones, which have played a crucial role in resisting Russian aggression.

    Unlike several European NATO members, Türkiye closed the Bosporus and Dardanelles Straits to Russian warships, limiting Moscow’s naval mobility.

    Sanctions are not the sole measure of alignment; Türkiye’s diplomatic efforts, such as the Black Sea Grain Initiative, prevented a global food crisis by ensuring Ukrainian grain exports.

    4. The F-35 and the S-400 Issue

    The decision to sanction Türkiye under CAATSA due to its procurement of the Russian S-400 system was a strategic miscalculation that weakened NATO’s southern flank. The United States refused to sell Türkiye the Patriot missile system, leaving Türkiye with no choice but to seek alternatives for its air defense needs.

    It is hypocritical to punish Türkiye while permitting other NATO countries like Greece, Bulgaria,  Slovakia (NATO members)  to operate(d) Russian-made S-300 systems without similar repercussions.

    The exclusion of Türkiye from the F-35 program disrupts NATO’s interoperability and emboldens adversaries by weakening alliance cohesion.

    5. Greek Provocations and the Eastern Mediterranean

    The claim that Türkiye threatens Greece is a one-sided misrepresentation of the ongoing disputes in the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean.

    Greece has repeatedly violated international law by militarizing Aegean islands, contrary to the 1923 Lausanne and 1947 Paris Peace Treaties.

    Greek airspace violations and unlawful expansionist policies under the “Blue Homeland” doctrine have escalated tensions, not Türkiye’s legitimate actions to protect its maritime rights.

    Türkiye has consistently called for diplomatic dialogue, while Greece continues to seek unilateral military escalations and misrepresentations to international partners.

    6. The Cyprus Issue: A Call for Equitable Solutions

    Türkiye does not “occupy” Cyprus but rather protects Turkish Cypriots from historical ethnic violence that began in 1963, years before the 1974 intervention.

    The international community has failed to hold Greece and the Greek Cypriot administration accountable for violating the rights of Turkish Cypriots.

    The 2004 Annan Plan, which proposed reunification, was overwhelmingly rejected by Greek Cypriots while Turkish Cypriots supported it, proving who is the obstructionist party.

    Conclusion: Türkiye is an Indispensable Ally

    Denying Türkiye advanced defense capabilities weakens NATO rather than strengthening it. Türkiye has:

    The second-largest military in NATO, securing the alliance’s southern flank.

    Been a reliable partner in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and the Black Sea in various military and humanitarian missions.

    Played a vital role in counterterrorism, energy security, and regional stability, far outweighing the misleading narratives propagated by interest groups seeking to undermine U.S.-Türkiye relations.

    Decisions on arms sales should be based on strategic security interests, not lobbying efforts rooted in historical grievances. Türkiye remains committed to its NATO obligations, counterterrorism efforts, and regional diplomacy, and it is in the best interest of the United States to reinforce this partnership rather than weaken it.

    We must recognize that we are confronted by a highly coordinated and determined network of individuals who thrive on promoting hatred and misinformation.

    These so-called “merchants of hate” have become adept at exploiting digital platforms and engaging with non-governmental human rights organizations in increasingly sophisticated ways to advance their agenda.

    If this ongoing campaign of delegitimization is left unaddressed, it risks becoming a significant impediment to regional peace and stability.

    While some may dismiss these smear campaigns as absurd, the consequences they produce are far from trivial. It is important to acknowledge that many of those perpetuating such narratives harbor longstanding grievances and nationalistic ambitions. Rather than examining their own domestic shortcomings, including the reality that Greece remains the only European capital without a functioning mosque and continues to draw condemnation from the European Court of Human Rights for its treatment of the Turkish Muslim minority, they attempt to shift attention through baseless accusations against the Republic of Türkiye.

    Greece’s antagonism toward Türkiye is multifaceted—extending well beyond the political and military spheres. It encompasses direct attacks on the spiritual and cultural identity of the Turkish and broader Muslim communities, including deeply offensive acts such as the desecration of mosques and the burning of the Holy Quran.

    Moreover, Greece has invested substantial resources in establishing a global apparatus of influence and propaganda. Through the strategic use of social media, transatlantic platforms, and well-funded lobbying efforts—particularly within the U.S. Congress—Greece has sought to shape international narratives to its advantage. These efforts are further supported by investments in academia, think tanks, and media outreach, all designed to undermine the legitimacy of the Turkish state.

    This issue has become another weapon in the international campaign to de-legitimize the Turkish state and the Turkish people. Once again, Turkiye is painted as a villain. 

    What we are witnessing is not a simple diplomatic disagreement but a deliberate and sustained effort to target the very existence and sovereignty of the Republic of Türkiye. At the heart of this campaign is a singular and troubling objective: to demonize Türkiye at every opportunity. This orchestrated rhetoric has become yet another tool in a broader international campaign aimed at eroding the legitimacy of both the Turkish state and its people.

    It is therefore imperative that we confront these efforts with unity, resolve, and strategic communication, firmly asserting Türkiye’s rightful place and reputation on the world stage.

    Respectfully,

    Ibrahim Kurtulus 

    Community Activist 

  • Profound Disappointment in Kazakhstan’s Decision to Open an Embassy in Southern Cyprus

    Profound Disappointment in Kazakhstan’s Decision to Open an Embassy in Southern Cyprus

    His Excellency Yerzhan Ashikbayev
    Ambassador of the Republic of Kazakhstan to the United States
    1401 16th St NW
    Washington, DC 20036

    April 4, 2025 

    RE: Profound Disappointment in Kazakhstan’s Decision to Open an Embassy in Southern Cyprus

    Your Excellency Ashikbayev,

    It is with deep disappointment that I write to you regarding Kazakhstan’s recent decision to establish an embassy in Southern Cyprus while wholly disregarding the existence of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). This decision is not merely a diplomatic misstep but an affront to the historical, legal, and moral imperatives that ought to guide Kazakhstan, a proud Turkic nation with deep civilizational and kinship ties to Türkiye and the broader Turkic world.

    As a Turkish-American who has long worked to strengthen bonds between our nations — including being the first to organize and raise the Kazakh flag at New York’s historic Bowling Green December 2021 on the 30th anniversary of Kazakhstan’s independence with then Consulate General Almat Aidarbekov — I cannot help but express my profound dismay at what appears to be a decision driven by financial and geopolitical expediencies rather than a principled stand for justice and historical truth. The fact that Foreign Minister Murat Nurtleu traveled to the island without even acknowledging the Turkish Cypriots or the TRNC is not just an oversight — it is a betrayal. His failure to extend even the most basic diplomatic courtesy to the Turkish Cypriot side is a slap in the face to the very people who have been systematically isolated and ignored despite their unwavering commitment to peace. Even Ray Charles could have seen if he was alive that there are two states on the island; yet Kazakhstan’s actions suggest willful ignorance rather than mere negligence.

    Let me remind Your Excellency that this year marks the 52nd anniversary of the establishment of the TRNC, an entity that exists due to the necessity of protecting Turkish Cypriots from the relentless aggression they faced. The Athens Court of Appeals itself, in its ruling of March 21, 1979, affirmed the legality of Türkiye’s intervention in Cyprus, acknowledging that it was undertaken in accordance with the London-Zurich Agreements. 

    The true instigators of the crisis were the Greek officers and its Greek Cypriot collaborators who orchestrated the 1974 coup — yet today, Kazakhstan chooses to align itself with those who have perpetuated injustice rather than those who have suffered from it.

    History speaks volumes about the intransigence of the Greek Cypriots when it comes to peace. Former Cypriot Foreign Minister Nicos Rolandis has documented no fewer than sixteen peace initiatives between 1948 and 2017 that the Greek Cypriots outright rejected. Most notably, the Annan Plan of 2004, which Turkish Cypriots overwhelmingly supported at a rate of 65%, was rejected by an astounding 76% of Greek Cypriots. Despite this blatant refusal to resolve the issue, it was the Greek Cypriots who were granted entry into the European Union, while Turkish Cypriots were left in diplomatic limbo. This pattern of rejection and obstructionism should have given Kazakhstan pause before choosing to align itself with one side while disregarding the other entirely.  As a leader in the Turkish-American community and as someone who has worked tirelessly to promote Kazakhstan’s visibility and partnerships, I must convey the deep sense of hurt and betrayal that Kazakhstan’s decision has engendered among the 500,000-strong Turkish-American community. It pains us to see a fellow Turkic country disregard historical truth, kinship, and justice. If economic incentives and political pragmatism are to be the sole determinants of Kazakhstan’s foreign policy, then what message does this send about the values upon which the Turkic world stands?

    Your Excellency, the strength of the Turkic world has always rested in its unity, resilience, and shared historical consciousness. The decision to sidestep TRNC in favor of a one-sided engagement with Southern Cyprus is not merely an insult to Turkish Cypriots; it is an affront to all those who believe in fairness, justice, and the preservation of historical truth.

    I urge Kazakhstan to reconsider the implications of its actions and to take meaningful steps to engage with the Turkish Cypriot side. Diplomatic recognition and engagement must be guided by principles of equity and historical justice.

    Respectfully,

    Ibrahim Kurtulus 

    Community Activist

  • The People’s Movement İn Turkey Must Besiege the Palace and Seize Power to Govern

    The People’s Movement İn Turkey Must Besiege the Palace and Seize Power to Govern

    For a long time, the people’s movement in Turkey has been expressing its reaction in squares and streets. However, these actions have only managed to warn the government rather than shake it. The uprisings in Maltepe, Saraçhane, and other cities have demonstrated strong opposition, but since they were not linked to a decisive strategy, they failed to create an impact that could truly shake the government. The main reason for this is the lack of leadership and the fact that opposition parties, especially the CHP, have not guided the process effectively but rather attempted to contain and limit these movements.

    However, a people’s movement should not only aim to warn the government but also to overthrow it and establish a new order. Walking the streets repeatedly or holding ineffective rallies will eventually exhaust and demoralize the masses. People want actions that produce results. If the current protests do not advance to the next stage, they will remain nothing more than controlled demonstrations led by the opposition, failing to bring about the desired resignation of the government.

    Besieging the Palace and Forcing the Government to Surrender Is Essential

    Forcing the government to resign and seizing power requires the people’s movement to escalate into a more radical and decisive phase. This phase involves centralizing mass street movements, organizing them, and ultimately targeting the core of the ruling power. As long as demonstrations in various cities across Turkey remain massive but confined within a limited strategy, the system will not change, and the government will continue to stay in power.

    At this point, the people and the opposition face two choices: either remain trapped within the passive protests orchestrated by the CHP and other parties or transform the people’s movement into a political force by creating its own leadership and directly aiming for power. If the second path is not taken, the process will remain a controlled pressure valve managed by the opposition, allowing the government to absorb the unrest and maintain its position.

    A Practical Strategy for Success: Mass Encirclement and Forcing Resignation

    To ensure that the people’s movement achieves results, the following steps must be taken:

    1. Establishing Organized and Centralized Leadership: The movement must create a vanguard and leadership structure. Disorganized and leaderless protests may generate short-term pressure but cannot achieve ultimate transformation.

    2. Moving from Squares to the Palace: Protests should no longer be confined to public squares or marches but should directly target the center of power. Long-term blockades should be established at strategically determined locations.

    3. A Sustained and Expanding Action Plan: The movement should not be limited to one-day or one-week demonstrations but must establish a continuous resistance front. Throughout history, successful people’s movements have only achieved results when they sustained their momentum.

    4. Clear Demands Directly Targeting the Government: Instead of merely calling for justice or democracy, the movement must adopt a clear discourse demanding the resignation of the government.

    Today, the protests orchestrated and contained by the opposition fail to unleash the true power of the people. If the people’s movement genuinely seeks change, it must move beyond marches and rallies and adopt a strategy aimed at seizing power. When the palace is besieged and the government is forced to resign, that is when real transformation will occur.

  • My lecture in Boston on April 6

    My lecture in Boston on April 6

    “Forgotten, Unforgettable: Marking the 40th Anniversary of the UN’s Recognition of the Armenian Genocide”

    WATERTOWN, M.A.—The ARF Sardarabad Gomideh, the ANCA of Eastern Massachusetts, the “Leola Sassouni” and “Shushi” chapters of the ARS, the “Nejdeh” AYF Chapter, Hamazkayin and Homenetmen chapters of Boston, the ACEC, the AGBU of New England, St. Stephen’s Armenian Apostolic Church, the Tekeyan Cultural Foundation and the Shahbazian Foundation are co-hosting a commemorative event entitled “Forgotten, Unforgettable: Marking the 40th Anniversary of the U.N.’s Recognition of the Armenian Genocide.” The event will be held at the Armenian Cultural and Educational Center (47 Nichols Avenue, Watertown) on Sunday, April 6, at 3:00 p.m. The event will be in English and free and open to the public. 

    The commemoration will feature Harut Sassounian, the publisher and editor of the California  Courier, as a keynote speaker. It will also include a presentation of the flags by the Homenetmen Scouts and a cultural performance by the ArtNova Hamazkayin Choir of Boston under the directorship of Maestro Artur Veranian.  

    After over a decade of struggle in the halls of the United Nations by Armenians, countering intense efforts by Turkey and its allies in NATO and the Islamic Conference, the U.N. Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities in August 1985, by a vote of 14 in favor, one against and four abstentions, adopted a report that included an extensive reference to the Armenian Genocide. This is the first time that a U.N. body recognized the Armenian Genocide. 2025 is the 40th anniversary of that recognition. 

    Harut Sassounian is a publisher, syndicated columnist, human rights activist and founder of the Armenia Artsakh Fund, which has delivered over $1 billion in humanitarian aid since 1989. As Senior Vice President of Kirk Kerkorian’s Lincy Foundation, he oversaw $242 million in infrastructure projects in Armenia. A former U.N. human rights delegate, he played a key role in recognizing the Armenian Genocide and has been widely honored for his contributions to journalism, philanthropy and advocacy. 

    ArtNova is Hamazkayin Boston’s new adult choir, led by renowned conductor and music educator Maestro Artur Veranian, with support from ACEC. Maestro Veranian, an internationally acclaimed conductor and award-winning musician, brings decades of experience and has trained vocalists performing worldwide. ArtNova has already performed at several Hamazkayin  and community events and is preparing for a full concert highlighting Armenian musical heritage  under Maestro Veranian’s expert guidance.