Tag: United Nations

  • Regarding the Turkey’s Candidacy for the U.N. Security Council

    Regarding the Turkey’s Candidacy for the U.N. Security Council

    Turkey, a founding member of the United Nations (U.N.), is an ardent defender of the principles and goals enshrined in the U.N. Charter, supporting resolution of international disputes through multilateral cooperation.

    Within this framework, Turkey plays a constructive role regarding all issues on the U.N. agenda and, therefore, attaches special importance to undertaking active duties and responsibilities within the U.N. system and other international organizations.

    Turkey is accordingly determined to increase its contributions to international peace, security, stability and prosperity, as well as to further its efforts towards strengthening of fundamental principles and values such as human rights, democracy and the rule of law. Thus, Turkey is announcing its candidacy for non-permanent membership in the U.N. Security Council (UNSC) for the years 2015 2016.

    The main reason for announcing our candidacy once again, not long after our non-permanent membership in the UNSC for 2009 2010, emanates from our belief that Turkey will provide significant added value to global peace and security in an era of critical and rapid change in international affairs.

    The Middle East and the Mediterranean basins are undergoing a political change and transformation process that is likely to mark the upcoming decades. These developments have further increased Turkey’s responsibilities regarding international peace, stability and security, thereby influencing the preference on the term for its next candidacy for non-permanent membership.

    Throughout the course of history, Turkey has constantly been at the crossroads of international, political, economic and cultural interactions. This strategic location has endowed Turkey with outstanding heritage, allowing it to take a wide and unifying view on issues without making East-West, or, North-South distinctions. At a time when the search for a new and inclusive world order has gained momentum, Turkey therefore stands out as more meaningful and significant.

    Turkey is located at the center of the Afro-Eurasian geopolitical plane, where perhaps all risks and opportunities in international affairs are most intense. In addition, by virtue of its dynamic, visionary and multi-dimensional foreign policy practices, as well as its impressive economic performance, Turkey plays a pioneering and special role in turning risks into opportunities, and producing cooperative solutions.

    Turkey has made substantial contributions to traditional global security efforts. Moreover, it has been a catalyst for expansion of good governance based on sustainable economic development, human rights and the rule of law, which together constitute an inseparable dimension of contemporary security.

    In fact, the active approach Turkey followed in the Security Council during 2009 2010, to which we were elected after 48 years, was to find comprehensive and lasting solutions to the current issues through dialogue with all parties. This demonstrated our constructive potential and added value for accomplishing global peace and security.

    Our policy of “zero problems with neighbors” and our efforts to encourage international cooperation and dialogue are also among the primary elements of our vision for creating a harmonious and prosperous climate which will render lasting peace and security.

    Turkey does not limit these endeavors to its immediate neighborhood. On the basis of the principle of indivisibility of peace, security and prosperity, Turkey initiates and implements mutually beneficial projects across a wide geography from the Caribbean to the Pacific islands.

    Our increasing assistance to developing countries is the result of a conscious approach to strengthen the strategic link between security and development, thereby placing global security on firm footing.

    Turkey is well known for its security-focused approaches to U.N. issues, and subsequent military and police force contributions to the U.N. operations. Turkey is now taking important steps in peace building, which requires a multi-dimensional and long-term effort. On this score, the meetings we convened during our membership to the UNSC took an integrated and determined posture towards these issues.

    Indeed, Turkey organized a session entitled ‘peacekeeping’ in 2009, which was later carried forward through a Security Council ‘retreat’ in Istanbul. In light of the discussions pursued at these two meetings, Turkey held the sixth summit meeting of the Security Council during its term presidency in September 2010. This initiative was crowned by a Presidency Statement, which encompassed the Council’s entire efforts towards establishing peace and security within a single framework.

    Turkey, during its UNSC membership, was also active in sharing its experiences in combating terrorism. Turkey took a leading role in the efforts to effectively combat terrorism, addressing its root causes, as well as building capacity to this end.

    Turkey will remain engaged in these efforts in the future. The ‘Mediation for Peace’ initiative we launched together with Finland in the U.N., refers to a topic occupying an important section in the Presidency Statement. This stands in testimony to our sustained engagement in this field.

    Turkey’s growing economy will constitute a major source of power in our future strides. Thanks to her sound and resilient economic and financial fundamentals, Turkey is among the least affected from the global economic downturn, and it currently ranks as the 16th largest global economy.

    By virtue of this fact, Turkey also actively contributes to the work of the G-20, where it is a member, and constantly strengthens and diversifies its assistance programs towards the developing countries. In this framework, the technical and humanitarian assistance provided to all corners of the world primarily through the Turkish Cooperation and Development Agency (TİKA), already an internationally known name, has increased significantly in recent years.

    Turkey hosted in Istanbul the 4th U.N. Conference on the Least Developed Countries in May 2011 and assumed an active role in the implementation of the road map, which will provide guidance over the next decade. The road map adopted during this conference constituted yet another indication of Turkey’s will to deploy her economic resources in the service of global security and development.

    Simultaneously, Turkey is emerging as a center for international organizations in recent years, including the U.N. Turkey currently hosts the U.N. Population and Development Fund’s regional office, Secretariats of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation, and the Turkish Cooperation Council.

    Hosting important conferences and events, Turkey plays a key role in the conclusion of fundamental documents and agreements that guide the proceedings of concerned international organizations. Among such conferences recently held in Turkey are summit meetings of OSCE, NATO, UN-HABITAT, ECSC, ECO, Alliance of Civilizations and World Water Forum.

    In addition, the meeting held in Istanbul in May 2011 of the Council of Europe Ministerial Committee (CEMC) which Turkey chaired for 6 months focused on steps to reform the CEMC and to nurture peaceful coexistence of diverse cultures in Europe.

    It is worth noting that Turkey harbors a rich and deep-rooted heritage in peace and harmony, takes a globally leading role in inter-cultural dialogue, and promotes the Alliance of Civilizations initiative, as one of the two co-sponsors, an endeavor that has become the most effective and expansive initiative within the U. N. frame.

    All of these factors underscore that Turkey, when elected to the UNSC, will significantly contribute to the UNSC proceedings as a country that holds diverse perspectives towards contemporary challenges.

    Turkey’s overarching foreign policy vision also defines its views on the prospective Security Council membership. This vision aims to:

    • act along the lines of a modern approach that upholds respect for human rights with a view to balance security and freedoms,

    • enhance respect for human rights, fundamental freedoms, democracy, rule of law and gender equality around the world,

    • achieve peace, security, stability and prosperity in its region and beyond through cooperation based on political dialogue, economic interdependence and cultural harmony,

    • take multi-faceted steps to establish a holistic, lasting peace over the long term and engage in efforts for peaceful resolution of conflicts and protection of peace,

    • ensure that preventive diplomacy and mediation remain high priorities, and matching resources are allocated for dispute settlement,

    • urge expediency in international efforts while combating terrorism and organized crimes,

    • actively support efforts to achieve the Millennium Development Goals, also bearing in mind the correlation between development and security,

    • ensure international technical and humanitarian assistance remain unimpeded,

    • bolster endeavors in the fields of inter-civilization and inter-cultural dialogue,

    • advocate reform efforts geared towards furnishing the U.N. with a more effective and democratic structure.

    It is with this vision and desire to serving humanity and contributing to the world peace and security that we decided to announce Turkey’s candidacy for the U.N. Security Council membership during the years. 2015-2016.

    Taking this opportunity, we wish success to Spain and New Zealand, two friendly countries with which we enjoy immaculate bilateral relations, which also announced their respective candidacies for Security Council membership during the same term.

    Thus, while announcing her candidacy with a desire for serving in the U.N. Security Council for a second time over a period of fifty years, Turkey has thoroughly assessed the best term suitable in offering her contributions to international peace, stability and security, and has taken her decision in light of this appraisal.

    Turkey’s constructive, proactive and reconciliation-oriented posture in the U.N. and other international fora, as well as the values that it has represented on a wide geography, are assurances to its future pursuits.

     

    Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs

  • Turkey and the Restoration of the Caliphate

    Turkey and the Restoration of the Caliphate

    Turkey, the supposed bridge between East and West, was, until recently, showcased as a model democratic and secular exception in the Muslim world. Since the days of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk — founder of the modern Turkish state in the 1920s — the Turkish military and courts were assumed to be effectively moderating against the theocratic and ideological hold of Islam evident in Iran, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.

    However, closer inspection reveals that this has not been the case, especially in the last half century. Instead, what actually exists is the veneer of a democratic republic overlaying an insidious, percolating revival of the Ottoman Empire by way of dormant Islamic fundamentalism and Turkish nationalism. Using financial and political clout on a global scale, Turkey and one of its premier Islamic leaders, Fetullah Gulen, have steadily gathered allies, including even in the United States, to pursue their dream of a global caliphate.

    The fight against modernization and secularization never really ended in Turkey, particularly among that country’s rural population, according to author and commentator Andrew Bostom. Bostom reviewed the scholarship of former Hebrew University professor Uriel Heyd, PhD. (1913-1968) who 43 years ago wrote regretfully of his belated recognition of Turkey’s re-Islamization. Dr. Heyd decried as shortsighted the view that the secular state had expunged Islam as a vital force in Turkish life. He traced re-Islamization efforts to the late 1930s and cited the dramatic rise of religious instruction in schools, the proliferation of mosques, Muslim supremacist views of Turkishness — only Muslims could be real Turks — and the return of the five-times-daily public call to prayer in Arabic following the Democratic Party victory in 1950.

    Thus, contrary to the current media view, the rise of Islam in Turkey is not a recent phenomenon attributable to Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s Justice and Development Party (AKP). But the movement toward an Islamic theocracy has indeed accelerated since the 2002 formation of a single-party government with a two-thirds parliament majority and Erdogan’s subsequent election in 2003.

    United States and Turkey

    Since the end of World War I when the German-allied Ottoman Empire was defeated and the sultanate and caliphate were replaced by the Republic of Turkey, Turkey has been an important U.S. ally because of its size, strategic location and profitable business opportunities for American companies. Although designated a “neutral” country during World War II, Turkey supplied the Germans with substantial quantities of chromites, essential minerals which harden steel for armor. The Turks didn’t declare war against Germany until 1945, ostensibly to be a party to final negotiations at war’s end. That same year, Turkey became a United Nations charter member and, as part of the U.N. command, participated in the Korean War, thereby earning a much desired place in NATO in 1952. The United States and Turkey enjoyed close bilateral relations through the post-Cold war period.

    Today the government in Turkey has moved away from the West, particularly the United States and Israel, and toward Iran and Syria, effectively changing the balance of power in the Middle East and across the globe. Turkey is actively and more openly pushing for Islamization and an expanded role for the Muslim Brotherhood. In 2007 on Turkish television, Erdogan admonished Westerners’ use of the term “moderate Islam,” by declaring, “These descriptions are very ugly, it is offensive and an insult to our religion. There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that’s it.”

    That should have set off alarms in the West and extinguished any fantasies of Turkey’s role as a pillar of “moderate” Islam. Erdogan had made earlier alarming statements, similarly ignored as in 1994, while mayor of Istanbul, when he avowed, “Thank God Almighty, I am a servant of the Shariah.” Further confirming his strategy in 1996 after he was dismissed as mayor, the future Prime Minister stated, “Democracy is like a streetcar. You ride it until you arrive at your destination and then you step off.” Since 2002, the Turkish government has been pursuing a version of Islam closely aligned with the Wahhabi extremist Islam of the Saudis.

    Islamization and Turkey

    The Erdogan government publicly claims to be democratizing Turkey but has curtailed freedom of the press, jailed and sued journalists for criticizing the government and confiscated newspapers and sold them to AKP sympathizers. AKP supporters have infiltrated the military and are suspected of wiretapping and evidence fabrication against retired military officers. Erdogan lowered the age for judgeships in order to replace nearly half of all judges with his younger AKP sympathizers. He also removed banking regulatory board members and replaced them with Islamic banking officials and is reported to have received significant financing from Saudi Arabia, including a known Al Qaeda financier.

    Anti-Semitism and attacks against Christians and Catholics have increased in Turkey. Expressions of Armenian heritage and culture have been denied, church property has been confiscated, Armenian instruction has been limited to two hours per week (although Sunni Islam classes are required in Turkish public schools) and it is illegal to discuss the Armenian Genocide. Although Turkey previously enjoyed good relations with Israel, the Jewish state is now declared an enemy of Turkey and the media has promoted an anti-Semitic TV series and several anti-Semitic films. Last year, instead of sending aid through legal channels to Gaza and despite Israel’s appeals to the government to stop the action, AKP officials openly supported the Gaza flotilla in partnership with the Global Muslim Brotherhood network. Turkey facilitated the purchase and departure from Turkish ports of the lead flotilla ship, the MV Mavi Marmara. Further, the AKP is closely tied to the Muslim Brotherhood whose spiritual leader — Yusuf al-Qaradawi — calls for Islamic domination of Europe. That Turkey, a NATO member, should have such alliances is quite concerning.

    In 2010, Erdogan received a human rights award from Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and recently refused to impose sanctions on Gaddafi’s regime, even as Gaddafi has used fighter jets to kill his own people.

    Just this past week, Erdogan visited Germany and told an audience of 10,000 Turkish Germans (of three million in Germany) not to assimilate but to remain part of Turkey. Turkey has used Germany as a strategic base in Europe and sends young Turks, who have fulfilled their military service, into Germany through the extremist Islamic Society of Milli Gorus (IGMG). IGMG members with German-born daughters are encouraged to marry off their daughter to these Turkish males so that they can obtain permanent residency status and create a fifth column of Turkish Islamists. Trade between Turkey and Iran increased by more than 86% last year and Turkey has been supplying Iran’s missile program. In return, Iran has agreed to contribute $25 million to the AKP for the upcoming election in June.

    Meanwhile, Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai recently announced in a joint press conference with Turkish President Abdullah Gul and Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari that he would be pleased to see Taliban officials setting up an office in Turkey as part of a “new phase” of building bridges and integrating the extremist group.

    Fetullah Gulen and Turkey

    A significant component and AKP ally in the changing face of Turkey has been the influential Gulenist Movement led by Fetullah Gulen, a powerful force in Turkey for over four decades. Gulen began a grassroots movement in the 1970’s with the Islamist political party, Milli Gorus, a worldwide Islamist movement with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. AKP emerged from Milli Gorus to restore Islamic religion and culture.

    The foundation of Gulen’s teachings is that state and religion should be reconnected and the country re-emerge as part of a pan-Turkic regional power. A 2009 article in the Middle East Quarterly by Rachel Sharon-Krespin titled “Fethullah Gulen’s Grand Ambition” quotes sermons delivered by Gulen on Turkish television in 1999 which provide insights into his methods.

    “You must move in the arteries of the system without anyone noticing your existence until you reach all the power centers … until the conditions are ripe, they [the followers] must continue like this. If they do something prematurely, the world will crush our heads, and Muslims will suffer everywhere, like in the tragedies in Algeria, like in 1982 [in] Syria … like in the yearly disasters and tragedies in Egypt. The time is not yet right. You must wait for the time when you are complete and conditions are ripe, until we can shoulder the entire world and carry it … You must wait until such time as you have gotten all the state power, until you have brought to your side all the power of the constitutional institutions in Turkey … Until that time, any step taken would be too early-like breaking an egg without waiting the full forty days for it to hatch. It would be like killing the chick inside. The work to be done is [in] confronting the world. Now, I have expressed my feelings and thoughts to you all-in confidence … trusting your loyalty and secrecy. I know that when you leave here-[just] as you discard your empty juice boxes, you must discard the thoughts and the feelings that I expressed here.”

    Beginning in the 1970’s, Gulen began establishing a worldwide network to promote Islam and Turkish nationalism. His followers have since established hundreds of schools in over 110 countries. Gulenists operate an Islamic bank with over $5 billion in assets and own significant print and broadcast media properties, NGOs, think tanks and a publishing company. Gulen recruits Turkish youth by providing housing and education and grooms them for careers in the legal, political and academic professions. In recent years, the AKP passed legislation allowing graduates of Islamic high schools entry into Turkey’s universities, guaranteeing Islamist leadership in the future. Gulen controls the majority of schools, universities and dormitories throughout Turkey. His followers remain loyal and donate up to one-third of their income to the movement. In Turkey, Gulen and the AKP together control the police, the intelligence services and the media and actively recruit diplomats for their utility as foreign intelligence satellites. Overall, the holdings are valued at up to $50 billion.

    Members of the Gulen movement extend Turkey’s influence across the globe and occupy important positions running several media outlets and controlling multiple organizations that facilitate the dissemination of their message worldwide. A visit to a Gulen interfaith and cultural center in Houston illustrates the politically attuned nature of the movement. Signed photographs of local and state politicians and other prominent people are strategically placed at the building’s entry way, implying acceptance of the center’s activities and giving the impression that the center is an integral and respectable part of the community.

    In 1998,Gule n was convicted (since acquitted in 2006 by Erdogan’s AKP government) by the Turkish government for “trying to undermine the country’s secular institutions, concealing his methods behind a democratic and moderate image” and went into voluntary exile in the United States. Outside of Turkey, Gulen’s goal has been to educate a foreign leadership sympathetic to an Islamist Turkey. But his schools are prohibited in Russia and Uzbekistan banned his madrasas and arrested eight Gulenist journalists for involvement in extremist organizations. In the Netherlands, the movement is being investigated for suspicion of being an Islamist fundamentalist network.

    Gulen, Turkey and the United States

    In the United States, Gulen operates the largest charter school network in America and enjoys the cooperation and protection of the U.S. government. His schools stress intercultural dialogue and tolerance. They include a curriculum that teaches the Golden Age of Turkey or the period of the Ottoman Empire, Turkish language, dance, culture, cooking and Islam, all financed by American taxpayers.

    Meanwhile, his worldwide network reaches into U.S. politics through aggressive lobbying, political donations and paid trips to Turkey for members of Congress and their staffs. The Gulen Movement in the United States represents itself as a multi-faith global organization designed to bring together businesses, educators, religious leaders, journalists and others. Gulen has placed many of his followers in large U.S. engineering firms, NASA, the White House, universities and Hollywood. Through his U.S. State Department contacts, he has procured H1-B visas to staff his schools with Turkish followers.

    Turkey through Gulen wields considerable power in American politics and is actively involved in lobbying Congress to promote its interests in Washington. Gulen was recently honored under Texas State Resolution No. 85, which recognized his contributions and promotion of world peace, with the Texas legislature describing the Gulen movement as fostering intercultural understanding and tolerance. During the 2008 election cycle, a Turkish-American couple, Yalcin and Serpil Ayasli — founders of Hittite Microwave, a U.S. military contractor — gave more money, $424,050, to politicians and political action groups than anyone else in the United States. In subsequent years, the Ayaslis have ranked among the country’s top 20 donors. The couple’s donations have been geared specifically toward advancing U.S. relations with Turkey and promoting Turkish interests, including stopping the Armenian Genocide Resolution. On this issue alone, “Foreign Lobbying Influence Tracker”, a service that tracks lobbyist interactions with government officials, reported that Turkey lobbied Congress on the Armenian Genocide Resolution and hired foreign agents to work with influential people outside of the government, spending $3.5 million and logging over 2,200 total contacts, including 100 with the executive branch.

    Until recently, Turkey presented its foreign policy as pro-Western. Before the 2002 elections in Turkey, Gulen secured an invitation for Erdogan to the White House, which was construed by the Turkish electorate as a U.S. endorsement. Although the United States has an air base in the country, in 2003, Turkey blocked the use of its bases for U.S. ground troops in the lead up to the war in Iraq.

    In 2005, Turkey became the General Secretariat of the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC), a 57 shariah law-endorsing permanent delegation to the U.N. whose mission is to safeguard the interests of the Muslim world. This OIC post strengthened Turkey’s Islamic agenda as well as the AKP’s stature. Assumption of anti-U.S. and anti-Israel positions has increased Turkey’s credibility and stature in the Arab Muslim world as it has moved closer to Syria and Iran.

    In 2009, Erdogan visited Iran and voiced support for Tehran’s nuclear program and refused to support economic sanctions imposed by the West. The Turkish-Iranian-Syrian alliance provides a hedge against the possibility of an independent Kurdish state, offers significant economic opportunities, enhances Iran’s power in the region, empowers Hezbollah and Hamas, puts pressure on pro-Western Arab countries and represents a serious threat to Israel.

    Current Middle East Turmoil and Turkey

    The current Middle East turmoil is an opportunity for Turkey and Iran to shift the region toward radical Islamist rule and elevate Turkey’s role as a regional power. The AKP government expects to play a significant role in the evolving Middle East political re-orientation. Turkey was one of the first countries to advise Mubarak to step down and world leaders, as well as the Muslim Brotherhood, are turning to Turkish leadership to assist the transitional government. Recently, Hamad Al Khalifa, the prince of Bahrain, sought Turkish intervention with Iran. The Muslim Brotherhood has extolled the virtues of Turkey providing the AKP with leverage in the Egyptian situation.

    When the Islamist AKP took over the Turkish government, the Saudis, who were fearful of the threat presented by Iran and mindful of their own lack of power, saw an opportunity to exert influence on the new government and to revive the caliphate. President Gul had worked at the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) in Saudi Arabia for eight years in preparation for the Islamization of Turkey under the Wahhabis. In 1991, he was sent back to Turkey to launch the Islamist movement under Necmettin Erbakan (1926 – 2011), Turkey’s first Islamist prime minister, and, later, the AKP.

    Under the Ottomans, Muslim power reached its zenith and the Caliph was transferred from Mecca to Istanbul, home of the Holy Relics and Caliphate Seal today, coveted by the Wahhabis since the fall of the Ottoman Empire. As Turkey is strong militarily, economically and its people are more nationalistic than Arab Muslim countries, the Saudis believed they could benefit from the alliance. With 100 million Islamicized Turks and Saudi funding of aggressive mosque building and dawa (proselytizing) in Europe, the resurgence of the caliphate could be a reality. The Saudis, who are motivated by the resurgence of the Sunni Caliphate, have played a significant role in Turkey’s rise in the Muslim world.

    Erdogan in partnership with Fetullah Gulen has made a concerted effort to target the military, take control of the media and stack the courts in order to realize the dream of Neo-Ottomanism — a return to Turkey’s Muslim imperialist past. In their long-term campaign to subordinate the army, the guardian of Turkey’s secular democracy, show trials have been held in which high-ranking military officers and political opponents have been arrested and detained without bail. The defendants stand accused of attempting to overthrow the AKP government. The AKP instigated demands by the European Left to curtail military activity as a condition for Turkey’s E.U. membership, although there is speculation that this was just a pretext for weakening the military and Turkey does not intend to join the E.U. Academics and journalists are also on trial for trying to bring down the government. In 2003, Erdogan used a constitutional amendment to target the courts and the military and secure the AKP’s rule in the country. Erdogan then selected Islamist judge replacements and President Gul appointed pro-Islamic generals and military officers.

    Turkey’s move away from the West, its renewed alliances with Islamist regimes and its disavowal of secular reforms in favor of theocratic rule under shariah could precipitate a precarious shift in the balance of power in the world. A portentous event could have been when Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad last month hosted Nureddin Surin, a Hizbollah-activist and the delegation leader of the MV Mavi Marmara, the Turkish ship captured by Israeli as it tried to run the Gaza blockade. Surin used the occasion to declare, “We are here today with the longing and the determination to build a Middle East without Israel and America, and to refresh our pledge to continue on the path of the Mavi Marmara shahids (martyrs)…..”

    The Iranian Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, took the opportunity to thank the Turkish Muslims for their fight on behalf of Islam. Given the strength of this alliance combined with Saudi largesse and a changing picture in the Middle East, a global caliphate under shariah law could become a reality.

    By Janet Levy
    American Thinker

  • The Cyprus issue has once again reached a critical stage

    The Cyprus issue has once again reached a critical stage

    We are now at the most important conjuncture since the period leading up to the referendum of April 2004, and as such we feel compelled to issue a very important message that portrays the feelings of Turkish Cypriots both here in the UK , the TRNC and other countries where there is a high Turkish Cypriot Diaspora.

    We all wish to see constructive action by the end of January 2011 and in anticipation we have taken this opportunity to show unity, and thereby exert pressure by way of a collective statement to the United Nations & the negotiators.

    ATCA would like to formally invite you/your organisation to join us in this action.

    IF YOU WISH TO SUPPORT THIS STATEMENT, PLEASE USE THE ONLINE FORM TO ADD YOUR NAME

    http://www.atcanews.org/atca/index.php?option=com_ckforms&view=ckforms&id=2&Itemid=78

    The closing date to notify us of your wish to be included as a signatory is midday (GMT) on Friday 14th January 2011.

    ***Many thanks to all those people who have already indicated that they wish to have their names included as joint signatories and who have also helped in the preparation of this statement***

    ****************************************************************************************************

    Kıbrıs sorunu bir kez daha kritik sayfaya erişti.

    2004 Referandum süreci ve öncesinden beri karşılaştığımız en ciddi kesiş noktasındayız ve bundan dolayı KKTC vatandaşlarının yoğun yaşadığı ve yurtdışında yaşayan Kıbrıs’lı Türk diyasporası hissettiklerini önemle ve büyük bir hassasiyet ile intikal ettirmek ihtiyacı hissetmektedir.

    Ocak 2011 sonunda yapıcı bir tavır, olumlu bir gelişme görmek arzusundayız ve buna dayanarak birliğimizi göstermek, haklı bir halk baskısı yoğunlaştırmak maksadı ile ortak bir bildiri yayınlamak istiyoruz.

    ATCA sizi ve cemiyetinizi ortak hareket edebilmemiz, birlikte faaliyet gösterebilmemiz için birliğe ve beraberliğe davet etmektedir.

    Cağrımızı destekliyor iseniz, aşağıdaki linkden isminizi ekleyebilirsiniz.

    http://www.atcanews.org/atca/index.php?option=com_ckforms&view=ckforms&id=2&Itemid=78

    Birlikte hareket edebilmek ve ortak mesuliyet taşımak icin son tarih 14 Ocak 2011, öğle saat 12 dir

    ***Bu ortak bildirinin hazırlanmasında emeği geçen ve şimdiden ortak girişimimizi teyid eden bireylere teşekkürlerimizi, saygılarımızı iletiyoruz***

  • Turkey grants UN food body $2 mln for Chad, Niger

    Turkey grants UN food body $2 mln for Chad, Niger


    Turkey donated two million USD to the United Nations World Food Program to be used as assistance to Chad and Niger, two countries experiencing lack of food items due to the ongoing drought. Turkey donated two million USD to the United Nations World Food Program (WFP) to be used as assistance to Chad and Niger, two countries experiencing lack of food items due to the ongoing drought.

    World Food Program

  • Turkish diplomat named new UN aid envoy to Pakistan

    Turkish diplomat named new UN aid envoy to Pakistan

    UNITED NATIONS, Sept 27 (Reuters) – U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon has named a veteran Turkish diplomat as his new special envoy for assistance to Pakistan, the U.N. press office said on Monday.

    Turkey’s Rauf Engin Soysal will be replacing Jean-Maurice Ripert, France’s former U.N. ambassador, who was named to the U.N. Pakistan aid post in August 2009. It was not immediately clear whether Ripert would take on another U.N. post, officials at the world body said.

    The Turkish diplomat “brings to this position extensive experience in bilateral and multilateral diplomacy and in depth knowledge of the region,” the U.N. press office said in a statement.

    Soysal is currently Turkey’s under secretary for political affairs and was Ankara’s ambassador to Pakistan from 2007 to 2009. (Reporting by Louis Charbonneau; Editing by Paul Simao)

    , 27 Sept  2010

  • Turkey Steps Into Void In Former Yugoslavia

    Turkey Steps Into Void In Former Yugoslavia

    Yigidi oldur, hakkini yeme.
    (Turk Atasozu)

    Turkey Steps Into Void In Former Yugoslavia
    Wall Street Journal
    Marc Champion

    ISTANBUL—The leaders of Turkey, Serbia and other Balkan nations gather this weekend to commemorate the 15th anniversary of the Srebrenica massacre in Bosnia-Herzegovina, in an event seen by Turkish officials as a crowning moment in its campaign of regional diplomacy.

    Saturday’s gathering, to be attended by Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, highlights how Ankara has stepped into a void in Bosnia left by the failure of a years-long U.S.-European Union effort to secure a new constitutional settlement aimed at ensuring stability in a still fractious nation made up of Bosnian Muslims, Serbs and Croats, diplomats say.

    “We put everything the U.S. and the European Union could get together, and yet we could not succeed,” said a senior Western diplomat in Sarajevo, speaking of the so-called Butmir process, name after the North Atlantic Treaty Organization military base where it was launched.

    The reason: Without Russia working to persuade leaders of Bosnia’s Serbian entity and Turkey pressing Bosnian Muslim leaders, a deal was “out of our reach,” the diplomat said.

    As the process ground to a halt last year, Ankara stepped in with a parallel effort aimed at getting the leaders of Serbia, Bosnia and Croatia talking, said Süha Umar, Turkey’s ambassador to Belgrade. “We had to intervene,” he said.

    In the Srebrenica massacre, an estimated 8,000 Muslim men and boys were separated from the population and executed when the Bosnian Serb military overran the United Nations-protected haven, in the worst atrocity Europe has seen since World War II.

    Serbian President Boris Tadic is due to attend Saturday’s ceremony; in March, Belgrade, for the first time, made a formal condemnation of the killings, a move Western diplomats say was mediated by Turkey and aimed at smoothing Serbia’s path to the EU.

    Western capitals have largely welcomed Turkey’s growing involvement in the Balkans—unlike in the Middle East, where Turkey’s vote against U.S.-led U.N. sanctions on Iran and its increasingly hostile relationship with Israel have triggered worries in Washington over the direction of a core regional ally.

    Turkish diplomats cite their efforts at mediation among the countries of former Yugoslavia as an example of how Turkey’s activist foreign policy makes it a more valuable ally to the West.

    Over the past 18 months, Turkey has built a strong relationship with Serbia’s pro-Western government and organized a series of three-way meetings with ex-Yugoslav neighbors.

    Ankara also played a key role in securing the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s April decision to grant Bosnia a formal road map toward joining the alliance, despite deep reservations in Germany, the Netherlands and the U.S. about the moral hazard of offering Bosnia a route to membership when it hadn’t fulfilled all conditions.

    Within Serbia, Turkey’s foreign minister last year successfully mediated a dispute that had led to violence between two political factions in the Orthodox Christian nation’s majority Muslim Sandzak region, according to Western diplomats familiar with the matter. Two prominent Sandzak politicians supported rival Muslim clerics who in turn answered to rival muftis in Sarajevo and Belgrade.

    Turkey offered highway construction, an airport conversion and industrial projects in Sandzak. On Sunday, Mr. Erdogan is scheduled to open a Turkish cultural center there.

    Turkey was Bosnia’s fourth-largest investor in 2009, according to the country’s Foreign Investment Promotion Agency. Turkish Airlines says it is in talks to buy Serbia’s main airline, JAT, having bought a 49% stake in Air Bosnia in 2008.

    Around 70% of students at the new Turkish-built International University of Sarajevo are Turkish nationals, many of them young women escaping the head-scarf ban on Turkish campuses.

    Not everybody accepts the growing Turkish role in a region that was under Ottoman rule for five centuries. Milorad Dodik, leader of Bosnia’s Serbian entity, Republika Srpska, has said Ankara arrives with too much historical baggage and is pushing exclusively for the interests of Bosnia’s Muslims, a charge Turkish diplomats deny. A spokesman for Mr. Dodik wasn’t available for comment Friday.

    Some Serbian newspapers have attacked Mr. Tadic for going along with Turkish mediation, saying he is abandoning Bosnia’s ethnic Serbs. Spokesmen for Mr. Tadic didn’t respond to requests to comment.

    And not everything has gone to plan. A May visit to Belgrade by Bosnian Muslim President Haris Silajdzic, negotiated with Turkish mediation, was postponed when he said he wanted to visit a Bosnian Croat convicted in a Serbian court as a war criminal. Belgrade refused.

    And while NATO gave Bosnia a Membership Action Plan, it won’t become operational until elusive conditions, such as agreeing on the status of military real estate, are fulfilled.

    Still, says Kurt Bassuener, a former strategic analyst for the Office of the High Representative, Bosnia’s powerful international governor: “If you compare the solo Turkish diplomatic efforts to everyone else’s in the past six months, they are the only people who got anything done at all.”

    Write to Marc Champion at [email protected]