A Tale of Two Monasteries

Spread the love

Thomas de Waal

|

September 9, 2010

On August 15 this year, a remarkable event took place at Soumela monastery in northeastern Turkey in the beautiful wooded valleys that the Greeks call the Pontus. The Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople celebrated the first service in the ruined monastery since 1923, the year when the Pontic Greeks were deported from their homeland.

It took many years of quiet diplomacy by church officials, non-governmental activists, mayors and—an important group in this rapprochement—musicians, for Greeks and Turks to bridge their differences sufficiently to let the Soumela service take place. An American photographer of Pontic Greek origin, Eleftherios (“Ted”) Kostans was in the church and wrote me his impressions:

There were a couple of stand-out moments I thoroughly enjoyed. One being the Patriarch’s speeches in Greek and Turkish. He was both eloquent and considerate of all peoples, in a way that made reminded us, we are all human first. The second wonderful moment was quite thrilling for me as Greek and as a Pontian. When the Patriarch walked through the crowed inside the Soumela walls carrying his staff I was just a few steps away and could see him gazing the walls. The smell of frescoes and priests singing suddenly came together for me. Silence hit the room for a moment and suddenly the crowed yelled, “Axios! Axios! Axios!” [the Greek word for ‘Worthy’]……It came from all directions as the crowed closed in around the Patriarch….Wow! For me, that was the climactic moment. Not just for the day. But symbolically, it represented the return to Pontus and announced officially that yes we are Pontians and this is our homeland.

Only a year before I was with Eleftherios outside the monastery walls on August 15, the Feast of the Virgin Day, when it all went badly wrong and a Turkish museum curator broke up what she declared to be an unauthorized service.

This year’s breakthrough was clearly authorized at the top, another move in the tentative “Christian opening” made by the governing AK Party, as it challenges some of the desiccated doctrines of the Turkish state. Plenty of powerful nationalist forces vehemently opposed the service as an invitation to “Christian fifth columnists” to infiltrate a Turkish state musuem. But now a precedent has been set, hopefully the Soumela liturgy will become an annual event.

None of this can be said a parallel service planned for September 19: the first liturgy for more than 90 years in the 10th century Armenian church of Akhtamar on Lake Van. The Armenian patriarch of Istanbul is due to officiate in what would again be a historic event—Armenians’ return to a place that from which they were bloodily driven out in 1915. Thousands of Armenians are due to visit, with many of them staying in ordinary Turkish homes.

Unfortunately, unlike Soumela, the Akhtamar service is threatening to turn into a disaster. Armenian officials and clergy are saying they will not come because the Turkish government has not carried through on its promise to reinstall a cross on the monastery dome. The government, currently locked in a fight over the September 12 constitutional referendum, is doing nothing to correct this.

I understand the concerns of some Armenians who won’t go to Akhatmar. They want to see rapprochement with Turkey, but they believe that the church service is a distraction from the political business that the Turkish government flunked when it failed to press ahead with ratifying the Protocols on normalizing relations, signed last year in Zurich.

But some Armenians are going much further, denouncing the whole event and calling for a boycott. One commentator called the liturgy a “scandalous show” and Armenians who are going there “tools of Turkish propaganda.” These people, who oppose any incremental changes with Turkey and demand nothing less than a full Turkish government apology for committing Genocide in 1915 are in a curious way the allies of the Turkish nationalists who oppose rapprochement for opposite reasons. If the Akhtamar service is a failure, it will be a blow against those liberal Turks, such as the governor of Van province and in the presidential administration, who are still pushing for normalization with Armenia.

I am certain of two things: There will eventually be a breakthrough in Armenian-Turkish relations. And when it happens, both Armenians and Turks will say things about the other and about the past that they are not saying now. The issue is all in the timing and how to build enough mutual trust to stiffen the resolve of the leaders who will do the final deal.

(photo of Akhtamar Monastery by Ioiez Deniel)

More by

Thomas de Waal

  • Civil Society
  • History
  • Religion

  • Armenia
  • Greece
  • Turkey

Stories Related to A Tale of Two Monasteries

  • Turkish Journey
  • The Never-Ending Armenian Genocide Resolution
  • Lobbyists
  • Letter to the Editor


Spread the love

Comments

2 responses to “A Tale of Two Monasteries”

  1. Kufi Seydali Avatar
    Kufi Seydali

    Indeed, it all sounds very well, but unfortunately too one sided!
    When we talk of Pontus Greeks, we seem to forget the population- exchange agreements which regulated the peaceful exchange of populations in both directions.

    Clearly, the AKP government ist eager to oblige, thinking that
    this gesture would help their EU aspirations! The same one-sided
    ness is being observed in the Cyprus issue, only the Turkish side making concessions. The Greek Cypriot Archbishop recently attacked the peace negitiations process mixing religion
    into politics once again (Remember Archbishop Makarios?).

    Both in the case of Armenian and Greek raproachment efforts,
    the Armenian and Greek sides are not as open hearted as the Turkish side. Friendship and peaceful co-existence should be unconditional and mutual. Gestures under pressure are not
    honest and have little chance of sustainability.

  2. The west is eager to sympathize with Greeks, but it is often forgotten that the relocations were on both sides: over a million Turks were forced out of the Balkan’s during the Balkan Wards, conflicts with Armenians results in mass migration from the caucasus and eastern Turkey towards central Anatolia…and there was a population agreement with Greece that mean that many Turks living in what is today Greece left their homelands for today’s Turkey as well. There used to be lots of Turks in Crete, for example, but they are now all gone.

    Would Greece show the same consideration the Turkish government is showing at Sumela and Akdamar? Greece still feuds about who is selected the Mufti in Western Thrace (where a minority Turkish population resides) and refuses to acknowledge their Turkishness – instead calling them Muslim Greeks.

    In short, rapproachment goes both ways…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *