No Respect for the Living or the Dead In Armenia; Case in point: Vahakn Dadrian


Okuma Süresi: 4 Dakika

By Harut Sassounian

Publisher, The California Courier

www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com

I write this column with great sorrow and dismay.

Vahakn Dadrian, the preeminent expert on the Armenian Genocide, died in upstate New York on August 2, 2019, at the age of 93. Born in Istanbul, Turkey, he devoted his entire life to expose the Turkish denials of the Armenian Genocide. Dadrian conducted his meticulous research in Turkish, English, French, German and Armenian, publishing dozens of scholarly books and articles in professional journals.

One would think that a distinguished individual such as Dadrian would be respected, not only during his lifetime, but also after his passing. Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan took the right step by issuing a decision on August 19, 2019, to appoint a high-level State Commission to make the necessary arrangements for Dadrian’s burial in Yerevan and allocated an appropriate budget for the funeral expenses.

The members of the State Commission were: “A. Harutyunyan, Minister of Education, Science, Culture and Sports; Z. Mnatsakanian, Foreign Minister; A. Torosyan, Minister of Health; A. Janjughazyan, Minister of Finance; H. Marutyan, Mayor of Yerevan; R. Martirosyan, President of National Academy of Sciences; V. Terteryan, Deputy Minister of Territorial Management and Infrastructure; V. Movsisyan, Deputy Police Chief of Armenia; Bishop Hovnan Hakobyan, Grand Sacristan of the Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin; A. Iskankaryan, Director of the Special Services for the Population; H. Marutyan, Director of the Armenian Genocide Museum; and G. Sarkissian, President of the Zoryan Institute (Canada).” Dadrian was the Director of Genocide Research at Zoryan.

After the Embassy of Armenia in the United States transferred Prof. Dadrian’s ashes to Armenia, a Memorial Service was held on August 31, 2019, at the National Academy of Sciences, where Dadrian was a member. The Service was attended by the State Commission members, as well as Ararat Mirzoyan, then Speaker of the Parliament, Dadrian’s 90-year-old sister, and other dignitaries and academicians. Prof. Dadrian’s ashes were interred at the Tokhmakh Cemetery in Yerevan.

Recently, when Maggie Mangassarian Goschin, Director of the Ararat-Eskijian Museum in Mission Hills, California, wanted to include a photo of Dadrian’s grave in her museum where Dadrian’s archives are stored, no one could locate Dadrian’s grave. After a lengthy search, Baghdig Kouyoumdjian of Paris and Hrair Hawk Khatcherian of Canada finally found Dadrian’s unmarked grave. It turned out that after three years of his burial, the State Commission did not have the courtesy of placing on Dadrian’s grave a tombstone or even a plaque indicating his name. The grave was shockingly covered with weeds and garbage. The two gentlemen placed a temporary plaque on Dadrian’s grave and cleared the weeds. This is the horrible treatment that this eminent scholar received in his homeland after his death.

Prof. Taner Akcam, a well-known scholar of the Armenian Genocide and Director of UCLA’s Armenian Genocide Research Program, was the first to sound the alarm on his Facebook page about the deplorable neglect of Dadrian’s grave. It is ironic that an individual of Turkish origin is more concerned about the despicable treatment of Dadrian’s grave than the Armenian government. Dadrian was Akcam’s mentor and collaborator on Genocide research. Akcam wrote on his Facebook page: “Dadrian does not deserve this. It is unacceptable and an immense shame that the grave of the founder of modern Armenian Genocide research is neglected and forgotten.”

In response to Prof. Akcam’s justified outrage, Mari Hovhannisyan, Program Coordinator of the Zoryan Institute (Armenia), issued a statement titled, “Tempest in a teacup.” She gave the excuse that the delay was “due to COVID-19 and the 2020 Artsakh War, Armenia was burying several thousand of its brightest sons and daughters, tragically lost due to both of these crises, each requiring their own appropriate tombstones.” This is an unacceptable excuse. Dadrian was buried seven months before COVID-19 affected Armenia and more than a year before the Artsakh War. That’s plenty of time to place a tombstone or at least a plaque on Dadrian’s grave, not to mention that almost two years have passed since the 2020 war and COVID-19 is no longer prevalent in Armenia. Furthermore, since Dadrian’s death, other individuals have been buried in nearby graves and they have a tombstone!

More troubling are the attempts to cover up this scandal. Zoryan’s Hovhannisyan wrote on her Facebook page: “We kindly request those who have raised this issue publicly to refrain from spreading unchecked information and making unnecessary comments, which can only lead to tempest in the teacup.” Vahan Hunanyan, spokesperson of the Armenian Foreign Ministry, and Harutyun Marutyan, Director of the Armenian Genocide Museum in Yerevan, issued similar meaningless excuses. This is the usual behavior of those who want to cover up their embarrassing mistakes. It would have been more appropriate to issue an apology and take immediate steps to place a tombstone on Dadrian’s grave.

If the State Commission members, appointed by Prime Minister Pashinyan, could not arrange to place a tombstone on the grave of a highly-respected Armenian scholar in three years, they should have been reprimanded by Pashinyan for their negligence and incompetence. This is a national scandal. It is also a regrettable indication that if Armenian officials cannot place a tombstone on a grave, how can Armenians trust their government to run a country with so many serious problems?

Finally, Prof. Dadrian’s grave should not have been placed in the Tokhmakh Cemetery. It would have been more appropriate to place the urn of Dadrian’s ashes at the Memorial Wall next to the Genocide Monument or the Komitas Pantheon, alongside other prominent individuals. That is the least the Armenian government could do to rectify its grave error.

,

“No Respect for the Living or the Dead In Armenia; Case in point: Vahakn Dadrian” için 2 cevap

  1. Mr. Sassounian, You insist on using unproven information without hesitation. For example, the events of 1915. You accuse Ottoman Administration with genocide, regardless of the 1948 UN Convention. which relocated only those attempting to revolt against the State. On this article you mention Taner Akçam as “individual of Turkish origin”. If this person were of Turkish origin, would he have made this unfair and unlawful claim against his nation? Examine his ethnic origin which may be Armenian.

  2. Mr. Sassounian, it would be surely better to consider the facts officially recorded instead of some tales to teach the history to the new generations, otherwise it creates only hostility based on fake stories. History is written based on the official records not to be misperceived, otherwise when it is affected by the political benefits then it becomes a misleading phenomenon for the humanity. So lets see the UK archival records, in particular the Malta Tribunal documents are the most credible reference source about what happened in Eastern Anatolia during World War I. Officially held at the British Foreign Office National Archives, these records are free from biased and backed up with first-hand facts, data, and evidence. And it is needed to keep in mind that the UK was the adversary of Turkiye exactly in those years. The British Foreign Office documents of the Malta Tribunal (1919-1921), conducted by Britain’s highest legal prosecution authority, Her/His Majesty’s Attorney (Prosecutor) General for England, and Wales in London, was closed in judgement of with the “evidence in hand” none of the Turks prisoned in Malta could be prosecuted on the grounds of the Armenian massacre. “… The charges made against the Turks named in the Foreign Office list are of quasi-political character”, and “no statements have been taken from witnesses who can depose to the truth of the charges made against the prisoners… Without… the production of evidence of a character which alone could be admissible before an English Court of Justice… it seems improbable that the charges made against … the accused will be capable of legal proof in a Court of Law.” This happened in spite of the strong political pressure of the UK Government on the court to punish the Turkish prisoners no matter what the official records said.
    With the verdict of the Malta Tribunal, it goes without question that the British Attorney General’s final ruling of July 29, 1921 corresponds to a “judgement of non-prosecution” which means, “there is no legal evidence to support the Armenian massacre claims, so there is no legal basis to file or bring a lawsuit.”
    Malta Tribunal is the historical and judicial fact that about the Armenian allegations and this cannot be discredited by prejudiced political or legislative decisions. Armenian allegations are habitually led by religious, racial, and surely political prejudices. Particularly religious based prejudices have turned the Armenian allegations to some sort of a one-sided pro-Christian story, and manipulated the history from the reality.
    On the other hand, as I specified above in my previous comment, in addition the massacres that armed Armenians perpatrated in the eastern region of Turkiye upon unarmed Turkish people (mostly villagers, women and children), in less than a hundred years, this time, Armenian army commited “Khojaly Genocide”. The pain of this real genocide is still so fresh as its official records are still so fresh in the UN, so it is not difficult to remember very fact that while invading the Azerbaijani land Nagorno Karabakh, Armenian Army committed the “Khojaly Genocide” just before entering the 21. century, in 1992. So that, in the USA, 16 state parliaments have accepted this cruel massacre as “genocide”, and it has been officially recorded by the Human Rights Watch, by the resolution numbers 822, 853, 874 and 884 of the UN Security Council, by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, by the European Court of Human Rights (22nd April 2010) and by the Organization for Security and Co-Operation Europe Minsk Group.
    It would be surely better for you to awake consciousness based on these official records Mr. Sassounian, for an honorable life and to be commemorated the same way.

Bir cevap yazın

E-posta hesabınız yayımlanmayacak.

Editöre mesaj gönder ya da yazıya yorum yap.
Bugün Gündem

Son Gelen Mesajlar

Son Yazılar

  • FEYM GRUBU BÜLTENİ
    Okuma Süresi: 4 Dakika Ermeni Faaliyetleri ( 05 Ekim 2022 ) 1..Jake Sullivan 17 Ermeni savaş esirinin dönüşünü memnuniyetle karşılıyor…Beyaz […]
  • Sansür yasasına direnmemek ölümü kabul etmektir. Sefa Yürükel
    Okuma Süresi: 1 Dakika Zalimliğin ayan beyan ayyuka çıkması olan ifade ve düşünce özgürlüğünün bir ülkede bir kanunla iktidar ve […]
  • “Şiddet topumu olduk…”
    Okuma Süresi: 2 Dakika Toplumda özellikle son günlerde şiddet olaylar, kadın cinayetleri ve ölümcül kavgalar sıklıkla gündeme geliyor. Söz konusu […]
  • İngiliz turist olmazsa olmazımız…
    Okuma Süresi: 2 Dakika Bu sezon belki istediğimiz oranda İngiliz turist konuk edemedik. Havalarındaki grev ve sıkışıklık bunun nedenleri arasında. […]
  • Çin Zindanlarında TC Vatandaşları ve Diplomatik Himaye
    Türkiye’nin yaklaşık 3 katı büyüklüğündeki Doğu Türkistan’ı Çinlileştirme projesi, bilinen Çin işkenceleri yanında en son teknolojik imkanlarla desteklenmektedir. On milyonlarca Müslümana yönelik zulüm ve tecavüzlerde milyonlarca Çinli görevlendirilmiştir. Kamplardakiler gibi evlerindekiler de izlenmekte, uygun görülen seçilmekte, kirli amaçlarla kullanılmaktadır. Fotoğraflar, videolar, resmi belgelerin önemli bir kısmının dijital tekonoloji sayesinde dünya ile paylaşılabilmesi, Müslümanları sessizce yok etmek isteyenlerin aşamadıkları bir ironi haline gelmiştir. Bu gerçekleri inkar eden yönetim için tek yol vardır: Başta Doğu Türkistan’da yakınları olanlar olmak üzere isteyen herkes Kaşgar’dan, Aksu’ya, Beşbalık Urumçi’ye, Tarım’a, Turfan’a, Hoten’e… köyleri, mahalleleri, evleri polis olmadan ziyaret edebilmeli, istediği kişilerle görüşebilmeli, kamplardakilerle gözetleme olmadan dertleşebilmeli, camilerin yıkılmadıklarını, ayakta kalanların eğlence mekanlarına dönüşmediklerini gözleriyle görebilmeli, gelerek herkese anlatabilmelidir. Sadece çıkar ilişkisi olan Çin işbirlikçileri değil milyonlar rahatlıkla bunu yapabilmelidir. Tıpkı Türkiye’nin Doğu, Güney Doğu dahil her kentine, köyüne herkesin gidebildiği gibi.

Message Turkish Forum on WhatsApp

https://wa.me/message/2RSZA7ULJ4EXD1

Turkish Forum, içeriklerin arşivlenmesi, yazarların yazılarının sizlere ulaştırılması için bilgisayar altyapısına yatırım yapmaktadır. Bu hizmetlerimizden memnun iseniz QR kodunu kullanarak bağış yapabilirsiniz.