GAME OVER!<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Mr.\/Mrs. It is with great concern and astonishment that I have learnt about your motion, submitted on behalf of your group on 10 April 2025, asking the Government to ensure that, by 24 April 2025 at the latest, \u2018the Armenian GENOCIDE should no longer be referred to as the Armenian PROBLEM, but as the Armenian GENOCIDE\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In doing so, I would like to state in advance that you are committing a legal offense, especially in the following points.<\/p>\n\n\n\n First issue:<\/p>\n\n\n\n In your motion;<\/p>\n\n\n\n Instead of the expression \u2018Armenian PROBLEM\u2019, which has been used in the talks up to this time, you demand that the ARMENIAN GENOCIDE be directly mentioned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In other words,<\/p>\n\n\n\n You make a claim that “THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE HAPPENED\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The claimant is obliged to PROVE his claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Otherwise, this constitutes a crime of slander and defamation. In addition, there is no CRIMINAL LAW that justifies this claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Another fundamental principle in Criminal Law is based on the principle of non-retroactivity of the law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n An act without criminal sanction at the time of the incident cannot be punished later.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is Article 7 of the Criminal Law of the European Convention on Human Rights that says this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So, what does Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights say?<\/p>\n\n\n\n There can be no punishment without law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Article 1: “No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the criminal offence was committed.”<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n In other words:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n “There can be no punishment without the law.” To cut to the chase:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Was there a law on genocide in 1915<\/u><\/em><\/strong>, the year in which the so-called crime of genocide that you accuse the Ottomans [Turks] was committed?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n No.!!!<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Then you are rowing in vain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide (the Convention) was adopted by the United Nations in 1948 (this is the international pillar of the law, as Article 7 ECHR) and entered into force on January 12, 1951.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Let’s turn to domestic law;<\/p>\n\n\n\n An act is punishable only if, before it is committed, criminal sanctions have been prescribed by law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Let’s assume that “genocide” was committed, since there was no law defining “genocide” at the time, you cannot impose sanctions under the name of “genocide”.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Not in parliament, not at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n You MUST give this action another name!!!<\/p>\n\n\n\n This new name you will give is not a crime of genocide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n You [the Turks] occupied the Ottoman Empire, imposed the Treaty of Sevres on us and wanted to establish “Armenia” and “Kurdistan” in Anatolia, and we defended<\/p>\n\n\n\n ourselves within the framework of the general rules of war.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Who is LEGALLY right in this matter: Will Dutch politicians or Turkish politicians decide for this?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Or do you want to suggest that the decision of a CHRISTIAN parliament is superior to the decision of independent courts of law?<\/p>\n\n\n\n No problem, only then, we should not talk about the legal decision, but about the church’s decision of ENGISISM – SHERIA!!!<\/p>\n\n\n\n As far as I know, due to the separation of powers in the Netherlands, politicians are not criminal judges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Criminal judges in the courts impose the sentence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, in order to prevent this unlawfulness, the rule of non-retroactivity of the law is also taken as a basis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Let’s assume that you apply the law retroactively, then again there is no problem and this time we should not talk about the Netherlands, which is a democracy, but about the<\/p>\n\n\n\n REPUBLIC OF THE BANANA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Because if you disregard Article 7 of the ECHR and the Dutch Constitution, then everyone has the right to take their rights into their own hands.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Second issue:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Your motion constitutes a CRIME according to the Dutch Constitution and Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as well as according to the Dutch Constitution, which regulates the separation of powers (separating the powers of the politician from those of the judge and the police).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Politicians are, according to the Dutch Constitution, only legislators and are strictly forbidden to exercise the power to act as judges or police officers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, you should know that by interpreting\/assuming, distorting, and portraying the historical event as genocide, you are committing two kinds of CRIME, both politically and legally, in accordance with the basic principle that CRIMINAL LAW FORBIDS ANALOGY.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the basic principle of “Nulla poena sine lege stricta” “Analogy is forbidden in criminal law”, a judge, let alone a politician, has no authority to make an analogy in his\/her conscience, when sentencing someone, i.e. when accusing someone of being GENOCIDAL.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Even if the judge finds the accused person guilty in his\/her conscience, he\/she cannot punish him\/her according to his\/her conscience if the act of the accused person does not fit the description in the law, the opposite situation\/decision would be arbitrary and would constitute a crime of law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Back to the topic at hand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Since there was no penal code in 1915 defining the punishment for genocide, there can be no punishment based on this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Let alone a politician trying to impose punishment by comparing historical events, IN CRIMINAL LAW; a judge has no authority to interpret the law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But you put yourself in the place of the JUDGE, the COURT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This understanding of law may suit your understanding of Assyrian or Christian in the Netherlands, but according to international LAW NORMS, you have committed a crime.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, even if the law in question is incomplete, the judge cannot make analogy in CRIMINAL LAW. And you!!!<\/p>\n\n\n\n Who says that, the Dutch Constitution!!!!<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, I have been living in Europe for more than 50 years and you have constantly nagged me, saying: “This is Europe, democratic laws apply here, adapt (integrate).”<\/p>\n\n\n\n Your motion is based on the ALLEGATION that an act of genocide, which requires criminal sanctions, has been committed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In your motion, you also accuse the Ottoman Government [Turks] of genocide and hold the State of the Republic of Turkey, as the legal successor and heir of the Ottoman Empire, and its citizens responsible for the legal consequences of the genocide you claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Accordingly, you are acting as if the crime attributed to the Ottoman Government has been PROVEN in a court of law, and in this sense, you are guilty of insult and slander under Articles 261 and 262 of the Dutch Criminal Code.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mr. Isa and your friends do not have such a final court decision?<\/p>\n\n\n\n In this sense, making motions and passing resolutions in parliament without a court ruling to get someone to say “You are a murderer” or “You are a criminal” is the crime of slander and we reserve the right to file a lawsuit against these persons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And the result of the possible LIBEL case that will be concluded in our FAVOR will go down in the WORLD as an EXAMPLE DECISION, let it be known.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dear Dutch councilors,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Not only we as ordinary citizens, but also the Dutch authorities or courts and especially YOU POLITICIANS are obliged to know these legal rules. Just to say:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ignorance of Articles 261 and 262 of the Dutch Criminal Code is not an excuse to escape a criminal offense: \u201cIgnorantia legis non excuat\u201d !!!<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is a principle of law that a person’s ignorance of the law does not, by itself, absolve that person from responsibility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Now, I am going to talk about the FINAL DECISION of the Court of Justice of the European Union, which will upset all your imperial plans, which was taken on July 20, 1987, by the European Parliament, i.e. the whole of Europe, i.e. all of you, i.e. the 28 EU-member states, on the Armenian “genocide”, with the recommendation number “C 190”: “Turkiye cannot become a member of the EU unless it acknowledges the Armenian genocide”.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Year 1999<\/p>\n\n\n\n The EU and the then Prime Minister of the Republic of Turkiye, Mr. B\u00fclent Ecevit, were at loggerheads over whether Turkiye could be a candidate for EU membership.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Don\u00a0Ceder<\/a>,\u00a0Kamerlid
Chris\u00a0Stoffer<\/a>,\u00a0Kamerlid
Derk\u00a0Boswijk<\/a>,\u00a0Kamerlid
Isa\u00a0Kahraman,<\/a>\u00a0Kamerlid
Caroline\u00a0van\u00a0der\u00a0Plas<\/a>,\u00a0Kamerlid<\/p>\n\n\n\n