{"id":34994,"date":"2011-06-04T18:47:23","date_gmt":"2011-06-04T15:47:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.turkishforum.com.tr\/en\/content\/?p=34994"},"modified":"2014-01-06T09:37:08","modified_gmt":"2014-01-06T07:37:08","slug":"happy-turks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/2011\/06\/04\/happy-turks\/","title":{"rendered":"Happy Turks"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"lead\">Real democracy is an intricate everyday process, as Turkey has found and continues to learn, writes <strong>Abdel-Moneim Said<\/strong><\/div>\n<hr noshade=\"noshade\" \/>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-34995\" title=\"amsaid\" src=\"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/amsaid.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"100\" height=\"153\" \/>It had been at least 10 years since my last visit to Istanbul, the  capital of the Byzantine Empire since the fourth century, the capital of  the Ottoman Empire since the 15th century, and the effective  commercial, economic and even political capital of the Turkish Republic  since 1923. In that decade the city has totally changed. It has become  more vibrant and elegant than it was at the turn of the millennium and,  more importantly, it has grown more composed and reconciled with itself.  Ten years ago, it seemed gripped by a kind of schizophrenia, its  personality torn between the East and West and between Europe and the  Islamic world. The condition was evident in women and men&#8217;s clothing, in  politics and the economy, in the divides between the military and  civilians, secularists and the religious, and moderates and extremists,  and in so many other social and cultural traits. Even with respect to  the outside world, Turkey stood seething at the EU doorway as other  lesser countries were allowed in one after the other while it was kept  waiting in the queue. At the same time, its relations were tense with  virtually all its neighbours: Syria, Iraq, Iran, Armenia, Russia, and of  course Greece and Bulgaria. This is no longer the case now that it has  adopted a foreign policy based on the principle of &#8220;zero conflict&#8221;, a  term one hears from every politician from the president to petty  officials.<\/p>\n<p>My latest visit was occasioned by an invitation from the Council of  Europe. One of Europe&#8217;s oldest institutions, the Council was established  in 1949 in Strasbourg, France, before the European drive to create  other cooperative organisations that eventually evolved to become the  EU. Although the Council of Europe and the EU share the same flag, the  former is more comprehensive, with 47 member states (nearly all European  countries with the exception of Belarus) with a combined population of  800 million. The primary focal areas of the council are human rights,  rule of law and democracy, and cultural cooperation. Although it has  similar bodies to the EU, such as an executive secretariat, ministerial  council and parliamentary assembly, its decisions are not binding on its  members. However, in its field of specialisation, namely human rights,  anyone has the right to file a complaint against his government before  the European Court of Human Rights, which formulates its rulings on the  basis of international conventions on human rights.<\/p>\n<p>The Council had invited me to participate in a discussion that  included some 50 participants, most of who came from the Greek and  Turkish parts of Cyprus. This was the last of a series of meetings that  aimed to foster rapprochement and mutual understanding between younger  representatives of the two peoples of this island through education and  promoting liberal democratic means and approaches to handling conflict  issues. My role, together with other professors, was to discuss various  experiences in democratic transformation and, naturally, the &#8220;Arab  Spring&#8221; was the subject of my lecture on the causes, problems and future  of the current wave of transformation in the Arab region. Subsequent  lectures would cover the experiences of countries that preceded us in  this process, such as Ukraine, Serbia and other Eastern European  countries.<\/p>\n<p>It was no coincidence that Turkey was chosen as the host country for  this seminar. This was not because Ankara was an early member of the  Council of Europe, but because Turkey had undergone such a profound  transformation over the past decade and because it is on the threshold  of yet another fundamental change. Following forthcoming elections on 12  June, the Turks will begin to draft a new constitution, which will  crown the country&#8217;s progress and probably propel it further forward. In  addition to its historic status and the cultural diversity it passed  through, it is also likely that Istanbul was chosen as the venue for  this event because it embodies Turkey&#8217;s transitional process, which has  freed it from the tensions referred to above. Now the city appears at  peace with itself, as pictures of Recep Tayyip Erdogan proliferate  preparatory to the forthcoming polls. All political parties have staked  as much ground around the city in the run-up to the polls; even the  Turkish Communist Party has a tent in one of the major streets. The call  to prayer is sounded at the stipulated time, confirming that this city  is not like other European cities. However, a European city is not  characterised by the absence of the call to prayer, but by the presence  of industriousness, enterprise, an open market and advanced technology.<\/p>\n<p>Tension has ended between the veil and the non-veiled, or at least  that was my impression. At any rate, during my three days in Istanbul, I  did not see a single woman wearing a <em>niqab<\/em>, but I did observe  headscarves and generally modest attire plus a noticeable tolerance for  the country&#8217;s guests whose customs and cultures differ from their  Turkish counterparts. Ultimately, freedom of choice is there, as it  should be. After all, the success of a government is contingent upon its  proficiency in managing the country&#8217;s resources and on its ability to  come out ahead in the international race. There is no need for those  displays that hail from Afghanistan and similar places, and that feed  tension and fear.<\/p>\n<p>From the moment you arrive at Ataturk Airport you find people ready  to help you. Somehow you know that they are doing this both out of the  goodness of their hearts and in order to help increase GNP. When a  country ranks 15th in the world on the basis of a GDP per capita of  $13,500 using the purchasing power parity method, or even 17th in the  world on the basis of a GDP per capita of $10,400 using the current  exchange rate method, you also know that happiness and efficacy are  attributes that come closest to describing the state of the country and  its people, and that their sense of pride before their admiring guests  is well deserved.<\/p>\n<p>Happiness, today, in Turkey is fed in part by what is happening in  the Arab world. From the Turkish perspective, the Arab democratic spring  found its inspiration in the changes that took place in Turkey and in  its unique blend of religious culture and secularism. If Amr Moussa  detected the powerful <em>khamasin<\/em> winds in the Arab Spring, the  Turks see it more in terms of the inevitable birth pangs at a moment of  momentous change. Which brings us precisely to the subject of the  discussion circle in Istanbul.<\/p>\n<p>Winston Churchill famously said that democracy is the worst form of  government, aside from all the others tried from time to time. His  remark was meant to underscore that complicated process that is set in  motion by the tough choices that confront a society at moments when it  needs to address difficult and complex issues and problems. This  choosing process does not exist in non-democratic societies where a  ruler or ruling clique, a political party bureau, a guardianship  committee, a central guidance council, or some other narrow ruling body  takes decisions on behalf of the people. In a democratic system, in  which popular participation in government is the prime defining  characteristic, the people have to make choices and to exercise  responsibility.<\/p>\n<p>Another difficulty with democracy is that the people and their  politicians have to accept a government whose authority is limited. This  is not just because the legislative and judicial authorities restrict  its powers, but also because a democratic society must accept that the  political majority and minority can change with every election and that  all political forces must bow to a prevailing set of rules and tenets,  namely the constitution and the fundamental principles of human rights.  The problem then is not just that a government needs to be brought into  power through democratic mechanisms, but also that this government has  to be an effective one, capable of managing the state&#8217;s bureaucracy and  resources efficiently towards the realisation of certain goals. Such a  government is not the type that keeps its people&#8217;s hopes pinned on the  results of a national mega project such as Toshka or the &#8220;Development  Corridor&#8221;. It is one that can accomplish things now, make significant  improvements in its standards of performance and levels of achievement,  and solve the country&#8217;s social and economic problems in keeping with the  programme it had set for itself at the outset. Politics, in the end, is  the process of managing and allocating resources. It is a complex  process that a government should not attempt to avoid by means of  high-profile long-range mega projects, even if such projects might be  part of its work. But nor should citizens try to evade the problem,  because they too must bear responsibility, which they exercise through  work, production, consumption and, more crucially, through their  political participation which makes them part of the processes of choice  and decision-making.<\/p>\n<p>The Turkish participants in the seminar in Istanbul were certainly  familiar with the complexities of the problem. Their country has come a  long way in building the &#8220;infrastructure&#8221; of democracy in terms of  education, the media, fundamental values and peaceful political  practices. Yet in spite of all they have accomplished, the most  important being reconciliation with themselves and their intricate  history, they realise that they still have a number of complexes to  overcome. In order to forestall political fragmentation, the Turkish  electoral system introduced the condition that in order to be  represented in parliament, a political party must obtain 10 per cent of  the national vote. This election threshold effectively limits membership  to only three parties, in spite of the fact that Turkey has 50  political parties. Also, in spite of the intellectual and cultural  openness that produced a match between secularism and a ruling party  with a religious outlook, everyone in Turkey is aware that one of the  foremost obstacles to their country&#8217;s accession to the EU is their human  rights record. According to a report by the Turkish Journalists  Association, 58 per cent of Turkish journalists have been imprisoned at  least once between 1998 and 2008. Also, during this period, some 1,600  cases have been brought before the European Court of Human Rights, most  involving human rights abuses and torture.<\/p>\n<p>Turks are very familiar with these figures. They are aware of the  need to address this problem through major security reforms, which in  itself is indicative of how difficult the democracy-building process is,  and then through the promulgation of a new constitution and the  addition of further improvements every day.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Real democracy is an intricate everyday process, as Turkey has found and continues to learn, writes Abdel-Moneim Said It had been at least 10 years since my last visit to Istanbul, the capital of the Byzantine Empire since the fourth century, the capital of the Ottoman Empire since the 15th century, and the effective commercial, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":83,"featured_media":34995,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[89],"tags":[200],"class_list":["post-34994","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-turkey","tag-democracy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34994","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/83"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34994"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34994\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/34995"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}