{"id":21652,"date":"2010-08-29T20:04:32","date_gmt":"2010-08-29T18:04:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.turkishforum.com.tr\/en\/content\/?p=21652"},"modified":"2014-01-05T20:37:10","modified_gmt":"2014-01-05T18:37:10","slug":"sympathy-for-the-turkish-devil-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/2010\/08\/29\/sympathy-for-the-turkish-devil-2\/","title":{"rendered":"SYMPATHY FOR THE TURKISH DEVIL"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>SYMPATHY FOR THE TURKISH DEVIL<br \/>\n<ins><\/ins><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"removed_link\" title=\"..\/..\/..\/..\/..\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/07\/ERDOGAN3.jpg\"><\/span><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-21687\" title=\"ERDOGAN3\" src=\"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/08\/ERDOGAN3.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"181\" height=\"86\" \/><br \/>\nBy Spengler<\/p>\n<p>The American commentariat is shocked,\u00a0<em>shocked <\/em>, to discover that  Turkey has abandoned the Western alliance for an adventurous bid to become the  dominant Muslim power in the Middle East. Tom Friedman of the New York Times  suggested on June 15 that \u201cPresident [Barack] Obama should invite him for a  weekend at Camp David to clear the air before US-Turkey relations get where  they\u2019re going \u2013 over a cliff.\u201d Friedman blames the European Community for  rejecting Turkey\u2019s membership bid which, he says, was a \u201ckey factor prompting  Turkey to move closer to Iran and the Arab world\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>But it is not quite so simple. Friedman and the conventional wisdom are  wrong, as usual. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is behaving dreadfully, to  the point that a group of retired senior Turkish diplomats denounced him for  \u201cneo-Ottomanism\u201d. But Turkey has not moved closer to Iran, except in tactical  diplomatic terms. The problem is more subtle: America\u2019s blunders in Iraq gave  Iran the chance to become a regional hegemon, and Turkey must vie with Iran for  this role as a matter of self-preservation.<\/p>\n<p>It was not the European Community, but rather the George W Bush  administration, that pulled the rug out from under Turkey\u2019s secularists and  built up Erdogan as a paragon of \u201cmoderate Islam\u201d. America\u2019s feckless  nation-building policy in Iraq helped Turkey over the edge into Islamism.<\/p>\n<p>In a recent essay [1], I portrayed the\u00a0<em>Mavi Marmara<\/em> incident in  which nine Turks were killed by Israeli commandos onboard one of the six boats  attempting to breach the blockade on the Hamas-run Gaza Strip, as a Turkish  farce. It should be obvious to anyone with access to YouTube that Erdogan  conducted an exercise in guerilla theater, which qualifies as a comedy of sorts  unless you were one of the dead Turks on the boat. What has transpired over the  past eight years, though, is a tragedy.<\/p>\n<p>Turkey is held together by weak glue. It never was a nation-state, despite  founding father Kemal Ataturk\u2019s ferocious efforts to make it appear to be one.  Kurds comprise somewhere between six million and 20 million (the Kurdish  nationalists\u2019 claim) of Turkey\u2019s population, and Kurdish separatism poses a  continuing threat to Turkey\u2019s national integrity.<\/p>\n<p>For the usual corrupt and foolish reasons, world opinion has focused on the  nine dead Turks on the flotilla; of far greater consequence are the several  dozen Turkish soldiers who died at the hands of Kurdish guerillas in the past  two weeks. More important still are the 2,000 or so Turkic people who died in  Kyrgyzstan in the past weeks. Much less distinguishes a failed state like  Kyrgyzstan from an apparently successful state like Turkey than Westerners  think.<\/p>\n<p>America is about to leave Iraq; Iraq is likely to break up; and if an  independent Kurdish state emerges from the breakup it will become a magnet for  Kurdish separatists within Turkey. Erdogan has 1,500 Kurds under arrest,  including the mayors of some Kurdish towns.<\/p>\n<p>Ataturk\u2019s post-war secularism defined \u201cTurkishness\u201d as a national identity  that had never before existed. \u201cTurkishness\u201d is something of a blood pudding.  Ottoman identity had nothing to do with nationality in the Western sense. It was  religious and ethnic. A fifth of the population of Anatolia before World War I  was Christian, mainly Armenian and Greek; virtually all were expelled or  murdered. The Turks killed more than a million-and-a-half Armenians, employing  Kurdish militia to do most of the actual dirty work (that is why what is now  \u201cTurkish Kurdistan\u201d was until 1916 \u201cWestern Armenia\u201d. The modern Turkish state  was born in a bloodbath, and founded on massive population shifts. The enormous  Kurdish minority got the southeast as a consolation prize but still longs for  its own language, culture and eventual national state.<\/p>\n<p>Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was a monster, but for the Turks a useful  monster. The 1988 Anfal campaign against the Kurds of northern Iraq killed up to  180,000 of them, and the crackdown on the Kurds after the 1991 First Gulf War  killed as many as 100,000. The Turks, by contrast, killed perhaps 20,000 to  40,000 Kurds during the 1980s and 1990s.<\/p>\n<p>Turkey in 2003 refused America permission to open a northern front against  Saddam out of fear that the war would destroy Turkey\u2019s ability to control its  restive border. The destruction of the Iraqi state, moreover, created a de facto  independent Kurdish entity on Turkey\u2019s border, the last thing Ankara wanted. If  America had simply installed a new strongman and left, Turkey would have been  relieved. But America\u2019s commitment to \u201cnation-building\u201d and \u201cdemocracy\u201d in Iraq,  to Ankara\u2019s way of thinking, meant that Iraq inevitably would break up; the  Kurdish entity in northern Iraq would become a breakaway state; and Iran\u2019s power  would grow at the expense of Turkey.<\/p>\n<p>Turkey has many reasons to fear Iran, whose possible nuclear ambitions make  it a prospective spoiler in the region. But there is another vital issue. Among  the fault lines that run through the modern Turkish state is a religious divide.  Iran exercises influence through the Alevi minority in Turkey, a heretical  Muslim sect closer in some ways to Shi\u2019ite than Sunni Islam. No accurate census  of the Alevi exists; they may comprise between a fifth and a quarter of of  Turkey\u2019s population. The late Iranian leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini,  declared the Alevi to be part of Shi\u2019ite Islam in the 1970s, and they have been  subjected to occasional violence by Sunni Turks.<\/p>\n<p>The Iraq war undermined the position of the Kemalist military, which had  bloodied its hands for decades in counter-insurgency operations against the  Kurds. Erdogan\u2019s Islamists argued that the weak glue of secular Turkish identity  no longer could hold Turkey together, and proposed instead to win the Kurds over  through Islamic solidarity. The Kurds are quite traditional Muslims; unlike the  Turkish Sunnis, the provincial Kurds of southeastern Turkey and northern Iraq  often practice female circumcision.<\/p>\n<p>After the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the George W Bush administration saw no  reason to back the Turkish generals who had let them down in Iraq, and instead  threw their backing to the Islamists, on the theory that Erdogan represented a  sort of \u201cmoderate Islam\u201d that would provide an example to other prospective  democratic Muslim regimes. When Erdogan won parliamentary elections in 2003,  Bush invited him to the White House before he took office, a gesture that  persuaded most Turks that America had jettisoned its erstwhile secular allies,  as I wrote in 2007. [2]<\/p>\n<p>The Bush State Department stuck to the story of \u201cmoderate Islam\u201d in Turkey  even while Erdogan used outlandishly extra-legal methods to dismantle the  secular establishment, as I wrote in 2008. [3] In fairness to the State  Department, the idea that Turkey was home to a specially moderate strain of  Islam was not the invention of American foreign policy analysts but of the Islam  specialists of the Jesuit order. Father Christian Troll, a German Islamologist  who advises Pope Benedict XVI, and his student Father Felix Koerner popularized  the notion of a less virulent strain of Turkish Islam. I reviewed Koerner\u2019s book  on Turkish Islam in 2008. [4]<\/p>\n<p>One cannot blame the Bush administration (nor the Jesuit Islamologists) for  the person Erdogan has become. By the turn of the millennium, Kemalist  secularism was a grotesque relic of 1930s European nationalism. Turkey\u2019s leading  novelist, Orhan Pamuk, evoked the spiritual misery of secularist Turkey and the  attractions of radical Islam in his Nobel-prize-winning novel\u00a0<em>Snow<\/em>,  which I reviewed in this space in 2004. [5]<\/p>\n<p>To the extent that there was some hope of keeping Turkey in the Western camp,  though, the Bush administration\u2019s nation-building blunders in Iraq and credulous  admiration of \u201cmoderate Islam\u201d in Ankara destroyed it.<\/p>\n<p>Political Islam as a replacement for Kemalist nationalism is the glue that  will hold Turkey together, in Erdogan\u2019s view. It does not seem to be doing a  good job. Islamic solidarity was supposed to persuade the Kurds to behave  themselves, along with a few nods in the direction of the use of the Kurdish  language, which the Kemalists tried to suppress. The killing of 11 Turkish  soldiers in raids staged from Iraq and the bombing of a military bus in Ankara  show that Kurdish resistance has not diminished. Erdogan, previously so  concerned about human rights and the Biblical injunction against killing, raged  that the Kurdish rebels will \u201cdrown in their own blood\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Erdogan\u2019s political Islam failed to stabilize Turkey. It will contribute to  instability in the region to an extent that is difficult to foresee. Iran now  has the more reason to assert its influence in Iraq, perhaps by encouraging the  breakup of the country and the emergence of a Kurdish state that might threaten  Turkey.<\/p>\n<p>Turkey, in turn, has all the more reason to agitate among the  Turkish-speaking, or Azeri, quarter of Iran\u2019s population. Iran will use its  influence among Turkish Alevis to challenge the Turkish Sunni establishment;  Iran will encourage Turkish separatism. Meanwhile Erdogan\u2019s alliance of  opportunity with Hamas undercuts the American-allied Sunni Arab states, Jordan,  Egypt and Saudi Arabia, not to mention Mahmoud Abbas\u2019 Palestine Authority.<\/p>\n<p>With the United States in full strategic withdrawal, a Thirty Years War in  western and central Asia seems all the more likely.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/em><br \/>\n1.\u00a0Fethullah Gulen\u2019s  cave of wonders Asia Times Online, June 9, 2010.<br \/>\n2.\u00a0Why does Turkey  hate America? Asia Times Online, October 23, 2007.<br \/>\n3.\u00a0Turkey in the  throes of Islamic revolution? Asia Times Online, July 22, 2008.<br \/>\n4.\u00a0Tin-opener  theology from Turkey Asia Times Online, June 3, 2008.<br \/>\n5.\u00a0In defense of  Turkish cigarettes Asia Times Online, August 24, 2004.<\/p>\n<p><em>Spengler is channeled by David P Goldman, senior editor at First Things  magazine <\/em>(www.firstthings.com).<\/p>\n<p><input \/><input \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SYMPATHY FOR THE TURKISH DEVIL By Spengler The American commentariat is shocked,\u00a0shocked , to discover that Turkey has abandoned the Western alliance for an adventurous bid to become the dominant Muslim power in the Middle East. Tom Friedman of the New York Times suggested on June 15 that \u201cPresident [Barack] Obama should invite him for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":83,"featured_media":21687,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[89],"tags":[1571,78,120,1153,1018],"class_list":["post-21652","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-turkey","tag-ahmet-davutoglu","tag-ergenekon","tag-gulen","tag-politics","tag-recep-tayyip-erdogan"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21652","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/83"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21652"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21652\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21687"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21652"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21652"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21652"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}