{"id":18361,"date":"2010-04-11T20:58:54","date_gmt":"2010-04-11T18:58:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.turkishforum.com.tr\/en\/content\/?p=18361"},"modified":"2023-04-08T10:28:52","modified_gmt":"2023-04-08T07:28:52","slug":"gazprom-socar-gas-deal-should-azerbaijan-commit-to-a-long-term-contract","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/2010\/04\/11\/gazprom-socar-gas-deal-should-azerbaijan-commit-to-a-long-term-contract\/","title":{"rendered":"Gazprom-SOCAR gas deal: Should Azerbaijan commit to a long-term contract?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/p>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div>\nBy Efgan Niftiyev<br \/>\nToday&#8217;s Zaman<\/p>\n<table border=\"0\" width=\"200\" align=\"right\">\n<tbody><\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><span><strong>WASHINGTON &#8212;<\/strong> In the last quarter of  2009, State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR) and Russian gas giant  Gazprom signed a medium-term deal &#8212; in the presence of both Azerbaijani  President \u0130lham Aliyev and Russian President Dimitry Medvedev &#8212; to supply  Azerbaijani gas to Russia.<\/span><br \/>\n<span><br \/>\nThe contract initially  envisioned export of about 500 million cubic meters of gas per year.<\/span><span>Gazprom\u2019s Web site said the two companies would conduct joint  technical inspections of the 200-kilometer Baku-Novo Filya pipeline, which runs  along Azerbaijan\u2019s Caspian coast to the Russian border, and ultimately modernize  the pipeline. \u201cAzerbaijani gas will be supplied to Russia along this route,\u201d the  company\u2019s Web site reported.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>A few months later, Gazprom CEO Alexei Miller announced that  his company is willing to buy as much Azerbaijani gas as possible. He also  mentioned that Gazprom &#8212; the world\u2019s biggest natural gas producer &#8212; will be  paying market prices for Azerbaijani gas. SOCAR\u2019s chief, Rovnag Abdullayev, also  expressed his company\u2019s interest in increasing the amount of natural gas sold to  the Russian side. Since then, Gazprom has tried to push SOCAR for a long-term  gas deal.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>At first it seems like a pretty good deal for Azerbaijan since  Azerbaijan lacks a direct gas link to Europe and has been unable to agree with  Turkey on terms for the transit of larger planned volumes. A SOCAR-Gazprom deal  would be an excellent opportunity for Azerbaijanis to sell their gas at market  prices right at the \u201cdoor\u201d without hassling with transit countries such as  Turkey and Georgia or waiting for the implementation of the Nabucco pipeline.  Thus, Gazprom\u2019s network is the \u201coptimal\u201d route for gas from Azerbaijan to reach  Europe.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>For diversification of export routes and for certain  geopolitical and commercial reasons, Gazprom\u2019s offer requires careful  examination and analysis by the Azerbaijani side. As of now, Azerbaijan is  capable of carrying out its commitments toward exporting approximately 1 billion  cubic meters (bcm) to Russia (the Dagestan region) annually. The second phase of  Shah Deniz gas production is expected to add 12 billion to 14 billion cubic  meters of annual gas output in three to five years once a market is found and  transit for the fuel ensured. Committing all possible gas supply to Gazprom  beforehand cannot be viewed as a viable option for Azerbaijan.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Azerbaijan may <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>lose its bargaining power<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Early commitments to Gazprom will decrease Azerbaijan\u2019s  bargaining power in terms of pricing. Central Asian gas producers Kazakhstan and  Turkmenistan had to sell their natural gas for significantly lower prices  compared to world market prices because Gazprom was the only buyer. It was only  when China became another possible buyer for Central Asian gas that the Russian  company offered fairly good prices to Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Along with commercial concerns, geopolitical ramifications of a  possible long-term commitment to Gazprom cannot be disregarded. Russia is widely  known to use its economic advantage as political leverage in dealing with its  neighbors and other countries. In the cold winter of 2009, Russia did not  hesitate to cut the gas supply to its consumers in order to push its political  agenda forward. Since then, European countries have started looking for  alternative natural gas supply routes. Russia\u2019s intransigency forced them to  think about their energy security and be cautious in their future dealings with  Russia.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>In line with this new approach, the Nabucco pipeline has been  proposed to create another supply route that is projected to bring about 31 bcm  of natural gas to Europe. Gazprom applies different pricing approaches to  different countries. The price that is given to Armenia &#8212; its closest ally in  post-Soviet hinterland &#8212; is much lower than the prices given to Ukraine or  Georgia, the latter started to import natural gas from Azerbaijan instead. Thus,  it is not that hard to see political motivation in Gazprom\u2019s  business.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Azerbaijani gas is one of the possible &#8212; maybe the most viable  &#8212; sources to fill the Nabucco pipeline, and it is in Azerbaijan\u2019s utmost  interest to diversify its natural gas exporting options. Being a major supplier  of the Nabucco pipeline would serve Azerbaijan\u2019s interests, and Azerbaijan can  play an important role in European energy security. Currently Azerbaijan\u2019s Shah  Deniz is the only deposit mature enough to be considered a base for forming  contracts for the Nabucco project.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Russia with the hand of Gazprom is doing its best to cut the  possible supply for Nabucco. It takes all re-export expenses and pledges to pay  market prices for all future possible Azerbaijani exportable gas, meaning that  to re-export Azerbaijani volumes, Gazprom would need to cut production and  exports of Russian gas, its main source of profit. This makes Gazprom\u2019s offer a  politically motivated rather than commercially viable deal. If Azerbaijan  happens to commit all its future exportable gas to the Russian company, the  Nabucco project will receive a fatal blow, and Azerbaijan will become highly  dependent on Russia to export its natural gas. This will ultimately enable  Russia to gain more leverage in its relations with Azerbaijan, and Russia will  hardly hesitate to use this leverage in dictating its political  ambitions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>\u2018Absurd scenarios\u2019<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Some argue that Azerbaijan may \u201cbribe\u201d Russia to make her apply  pressure on Armenia so that Russia forces the latter to take a more constructive  position in peace talks over the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. This scenario is  totally absurd. Although Russia has a great deal of political and economic  influence on Armenia, this scenario is unlikely to happen because Russia is not  interested in resolving the frozen Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, contrary to  official Russian statements and its role as a mediator. Instead she has always  used separatist conflicts to overpower post-Soviet countries. On the other hand,  Azerbaijan, under the leadership of father Aliyev, pursued a similar purpose  while making oil contracts with Western companies. Along with commercial gains,  Azerbaijan expected to strengthen its bargaining position against Armenia while  trying to become an important partner of the West. The commercial side of the  story has played out quite well, and Azerbaijan also bolstered its independence  and sovereignty. However, this policy did not produce desired outcomes for  Azerbaijan in terms of making Western countries exert more pressure on Armenia.  For all these reasons, it would not be wise for Azerbaijan to pursue the same  tactic in its dealings with Russia.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Azerbaijan has to consider all possible ramifications of  signing long-term deals with Gazprom and granting all its possible exportable  gas to the Russian company. Azerbaijan should never be willing to experience  what Turkmenistan experienced in its dealings with Gazprom. Gazprom\u2019s unilateral  reduction &#8212; at short notice &#8212; of the gas that it takes from Turkmenistan  showed that Gazprom is far from being reliable and has the potential to carry  out irresponsible actions. Along with Gazprom\u2019s credibility, commercial  viability and geopolitical implications of the agreement should be carefully  analyzed given Gazprom\u2019s stature as a reliable and a credible gas buyer. Having  vast natural sources is not enough. The wise management of those sources is much  more important.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Efgan Niftiyev Today&#8217;s Zaman WASHINGTON &#8212; In the last quarter of 2009, State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR) and Russian gas giant Gazprom signed a medium-term deal &#8212; in the presence of both Azerbaijani President \u0130lham Aliyev and Russian President Dimitry Medvedev &#8212; to supply Azerbaijani gas to Russia. The contract initially envisioned [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":83,"featured_media":783741,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[41],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18361","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-azerbaijan"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18361","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/83"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18361"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18361\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/783741"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18361"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18361"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18361"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}