{"id":15952,"date":"2009-11-05T23:52:56","date_gmt":"2009-11-05T21:52:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.turkishforum.com.tr\/en\/content\/?p=15952"},"modified":"2009-11-05T23:52:56","modified_gmt":"2009-11-05T21:52:56","slug":"internal-documents-reveal-by-harut-sassounian","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/2009\/11\/05\/internal-documents-reveal-by-harut-sassounian\/","title":{"rendered":"Internal Documents Reveal.."},"content":{"rendered":"<table border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><\/p>\n<div>UK Officials Misled Parliament on Armenian Genocide<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><span><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-15953\" title=\"SASSUN-2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/11\/SASSUN-2.jpg\" alt=\"SASSUN-2\" width=\"300\" height=\"327\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/11\/SASSUN-2.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/11\/SASSUN-2-275x300.jpg 275w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/span><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>A prominent legal expert, Mr. Geoffrey Robertson, exposed this week the  false and inaccurate statements on the Armenian Genocide made by the British  Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO). The international jurist revealed that  for many years the FCO (Foreign Ministry) had misled the British Parliament on  the facts of the Armenian Genocide in order to curry favor with the Turkish  government.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>The 40-page meticulously-researched report, commissioned by the Armenian  Centre of London, is based on hitherto secret documents obtained from the  Foreign Office through the Freedom of Information Act. Mr. Robertson, the author  of a report titled, &#8220;Was there an Armenian Genocide?&#8221; served as first President  of the UN War Crimes Court in Sierra Leone.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Mr. Robertson had to make repeated requests over several months to the  British government in order to obtain internal documents that the Foreign Office  was legally obligated to release. According to the FCO, some of the documents  were not released at all, while those eventually made public were partially  blacked out, in order not to damage Britain\u2019s relations with Turkey.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>In his report, Mr. Robertson explains that the Armenian Centre had asked  him &#8220;to consider the attitude of the British government in refusing to accept  that the massacres of Armenians in 1915-16 amounted to genocide, and whether its  reasons for taking this position are valid and sustainable in international  law.&#8221;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Regrettably, today\u2019s British officials have forgotten their government\u2019s  declaration, issued jointly with France and Russia on May 28, 1915, warning that  &#8220;in view of the crimes of Turkey against humanity and civilization,&#8221; the three  great powers would hold responsible &#8220;all members of the Ottoman government&#8221; who  are implicated in the Armenian massacres.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>The recently obtained internal documents reveal the Foreign Office\u2019s  misleading, false and sinister intent. In a 1999 memorandum, addressed to  Minister of State for Europe Joyce Quin and others, the FCO stated that it is  not the British government\u2019s obligation to decide what constitutes genocide:  &#8220;Investigating, analyzing and interpreting history is a matter for historians.&#8221;  In contrast, Attorney Robertson points out the government\u2019s &#8220;basic error&#8221; in  relying &#8220;on historians to decide a legal issue.&#8221; He explains that &#8220;deciding what  amounts to genocide is a matter for judgment according to international law, and  not al all is a matter for historians. Historians establish facts: lawyers must  judge whether those facts amount to a breach of international law.&#8221;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>In the same memorandum, the Foreign Office states that there is no  documentary evidence proving that the mass killings of Armenians were a result  of deliberate state policy. Mr. Robertson calls this statement &#8220;another canard  &#8212; that appears routinely and repeatedly&#8221; in internal FCO communications &#8212; &#8220;the  notion that there must be some written document that records a government or  leadership decision to exterminate the Armenian people.&#8221; Mr. Robertson points  out that &#8220;no such document, of course, exists in relation to the Nazi  Holocaust.&#8221;<\/div>\n<div>Clearly, the Foreign Office is more concerned about the domestic and  overseas ramifications of acknowledging the Armenian Genocide than the crime of  genocide itself. Mr. Robertson points out: &#8220;the memorandum goes on rather  cynically to consider the clout of the campaign to recognise the genocide and  notes that \u2018the campaign does not appear at this stage to have enough support or  direction to seriously embarrass HMG [Her Majesty\u2019s Government].\u2019&#8221;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>The Foreign Office also places a higher premium on appeasing Turkey than on  the moral issues arising from the attempted extermination of an entire nation.  &#8220;HMG is open to criticism in terms of the ethical dimension,&#8221; the FCO readily  admits. &#8220;But given the importance of our relations (political, strategic and  commercial) with Turkey, and that recognising the genocide would provide no  practical benefit to the UK or the few survivors of the killings still alive  today, nor would it help a rapprochement between Armenia and Turkey, the current  line is the only feasible option.&#8221; Mr. Robertson sarcastically, yet sadly,  remarks: &#8220;This particular genocide could not be recognised &#8212; not because it had  not taken place, but because it was politically and commercially inconvenient to  do so.&#8221;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Another false argument advanced by the Foreign Office in several memoranda  is the contention that the UN Genocide Convention of 1948 has no retroactive  effect and therefore, does not apply to the Armenian Genocide. Mr. Robertson, a  top expert in the field of international law, quickly quashes this &#8220;bad point,&#8221;  because &#8220;the rule against retroactivity applies to criminal charges, made  against individuals, of offences which were not against the law at the time they  were allegedly committed. Nobody is suggesting that criminal charges should be  brought now against long dead individuals &#8212; the question is whether the  massacre of the Armenians is correctly described as \u2018genocide,\u2019 according to the  definition adopted by the UN Convention in 1948.&#8221;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>British Minister of State for Europe, Joyce Quin, was so incensed by her  government\u2019s extremism in &#8220;genocide denial,&#8221; and its allegation that there was  no evidence of a Turkish intent to commit genocide that, in an April 13, 1999  memorandum to the Foreign Office, she pointed out that the issue of intent had  never been examined by government officials.<\/div>\n<div>Mr. Robertson\u2019s report then relates the diplomatic scandal involving Thorda  Abott-Watt, the British Ambassador to Armenia, who shamelessly questioned the  veracity of the Armenian Genocide during a 2004 interview in Yerevan. She stated  that the evidence regarding the Armenian Genocide &#8220;was not sufficiently  unequivocal&#8221; to be categorized as genocide under the UN Genocide Convention. In  response to several columns I wrote at that time, thousands of readers worldwide  inundated the British Foreign Office and the Armenian Foreign Ministry with  letters of complaint. The Armenian government finally delivered a &#8220;Note verbale&#8221;  (protest note) to the British government. Mr. Robertson uncovered an internal  FCO memorandum written during that controversy, suggesting that the British  government maintain its denialist policy, since Turkey &#8220;devotes major diplomatic  resources to heading off any possible recognition. Turkey would react very  strongly indeed to any suggestion of recognition by the UK.&#8221;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>In his examination of the hundreds of pages of recently released documents,  Mr. Robertson came across &#8220;only one obscure and dismissive reference&#8221; by the  Foreign Office to the &#8220;one credible international inquiry&#8221; that classified the  Armenian mass killings as Genocide. This unique study was carried out in 1985 by  the British Special Rapporteur, Benjamin Whitaker, at the request of the UN  Sub-Commission on the Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities.  To his chagrin, Mr. Robertson found out that the Foreign Office had issued a  memorandum advising government ministers to dismiss the UN 1985 report by  stating that &#8220;since then, we are not aware of it being mentioned in any UN  document or forum.&#8221;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Even after several European countries had recognized the Armenian Genocide,  the Foreign Office continued to stubbornly cling to its denialist policy by  advising Minister of State for Europe, Geoff Hoon, that &#8220;Turkey is neuralgic and  defensive about the charge of genocide despite the fact that the events occurred  at the time of the Ottoman Empire as opposed to modern day Turkey. There were  many Turks who lost their lives in the war and there may also be an element of  concern over compensation claims should they accept the charge of genocide. This  defensiveness has meant that Turkey has historically stifled debate at home and  devoted considerable diplomatic effort to dissuading any further  recognition.&#8221;<\/div>\n<div>Finally, in October 2007, when the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee  adopted a resolution acknowledging the Armenian Genocide, the Foreign Office  wrote an alarming memorandum, expressing concern that &#8220;the Armenian diaspora  worldwide lobbying machine&#8221; would now &#8220;go into overdrive!&#8221;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Mr. Robertson, based on his examination of the released internal documents  written over a 10-year period, concludes that the advice given by the British  Foreign Office to government ministers &#8220;reflects neither the law of genocide nor  the demonstrable facts of the massacres in 1915-16, and has been calculated to  mislead parliament into believing that there has been an assessment of evidence  and an exercise of judgment on that evidence.&#8221;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Mr. Robertson further establishes that the &#8220;parliament has been routinely  misinformed, by ministers who have recited FCO briefs without questioning their  accuracy. HMG\u2019s [Her Majesty\u2019s Government] real and only policy has been to  evade truthful answers to questions about the Armenian genocide, because the  truth would discomfort the Turkish government!&#8221;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>In view of revelations of such misconduct and misrepresentation, the  British Parliament should hold formal hearings and investigate the conduct of  all officials who provided false and misleading information to Parliament  members for well over a decade. Those found to be either negligent in carrying  out their duties or complicit in providing outright falsehoods, should have  charges filed against them or dismissed from their governmental posts.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>In addition, Mr. Robertson, a pre-eminent international jurist, should be  asked to file legal action against the Turkish government in British courts, and  more importantly, in the European Court of Human Rights.<\/div>\n<div>This extremely valuable report should be translated into several major  languages and disseminated worldwide.<\/div>\n<p><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>UK Officials Misled Parliament on Armenian Genocide A prominent legal expert, Mr. Geoffrey Robertson, exposed this week the false and inaccurate statements on the Armenian Genocide made by the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO). The international jurist revealed that for many years the FCO (Foreign Ministry) had misled the British Parliament on the facts [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":83,"featured_media":49467,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[145,1571,78,120,204,1018],"class_list":["post-15952","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-armenian-question","tag-barack-obama","tag-ahmet-davutoglu","tag-ergenekon","tag-gulen","tag-nagorno-karabakh","tag-recep-tayyip-erdogan"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15952","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/83"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15952"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15952\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/49467"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15952"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15952"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.turkishnews.com\/en\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15952"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}