Tag: Israel’s ambassador

  • Silence in the Face of Open Hostility

    Silence in the Face of Open Hostility

    A Failure of Diplomatic Duty in New York By Turkish Consul General Ahmet Yazal.

     / Israel’s Consul General in New York, Ofir Akunis. 

    Once again, we witness a troubling and unacceptable silence from the Turkish Consul General in New York, Mr. Ahmet Yazal this time in the face of an extraordinary and hostile declaration made publicly by Israel’s Consul General in New York, Ofir Akunis. Speaking live on a Tel Aviv nbased news channel, Mr. Akunis did not engage in routine diplomatic criticism or policy disagreement. He crossed a far more serious line by explicitly labeling the Republic of Türkiye  our  NATO ally and sovereign state as an “enemy,” declaring: “There is a growing Turkish threat in our region. To be frank, Ankara is our enemy. We must do everything in our power to prevent this enemy from harming us.”

    This was not rhetoric spoken in a moment of emotional excess. It was a calculated, on the record statement by a sitting foreign diplomat, made while holding an official post in New York. Such language is unprecedented, inflammatory, and deeply destabilizing particularly when directed at a NATO ally from the diplomatic capital of the world. Yet, once again, the Turkish Consulate in New York remained conspicuously silent.

    Silence in diplomacy is not neutrality. Silence in the face of open hostility is abdication.

    The role of a Consul General especially in a city as influential as New York is not ceremonial, nor is it limited to photo opportunities, receptions, and social appearances. It is a position of strategic responsibility. The Consul General is entrusted with defending the honor, sovereignty, and national interests of the Republic of Türkiye; countering smear campaigns; responding decisively to hostile narratives; and ensuring that Türkiye’s voice is heard clearly, firmly, and with dignity in international forums. Once again Mr Yazal , is Not heard from again.

    When a foreign diplomat openly threatens and labels Türkiye an “enemy” from New York, the absence of an immediate, firm, and public response is not merely disappointing it is damaging. It sends the wrong signal to allies, adversaries, and the Turkish American community alike. My Yazal once again has failed the Turkish Americans. It normalizes hostile rhetoric. It emboldens those who seek to portray Türkiye as a pariah rather than a key regional power and indispensable Western ally.

    Mr. Yazal’s continued silence follows a pattern, not an exception. Time and again, when Türkiye is targeted by coordinated disinformation campaigns, historical distortions, or outright diplomatic provocations, the Consulate General in New York appears absent from the battlefield where narratives are shaped and reputations are defended. Diplomacy is not passive observation; it is active engagement. Failing to respond is, in effect, allowing others to define Türkiye without challenge.

    Let me be clear,  defending Türkiye does not require aggression, nor does it mean abandoning diplomatic decorum. But it does require resolve, clarity, and courage- we have once again seen a weak Mr. Yazal. A firm rebuttal, a formal protest, an official statement reaffirming Türkiye’s position and rejecting hostile language these are basic expectations, not extraordinary demands.

    Our NATO ally  the Republic of Türkiye is not a country that needs others to speak on its behalf. It is a strong, sovereign state with a deep diplomatic tradition and a proud history of standing its ground. When its senior representatives abroad fail to uphold that tradition, it raises serious questions about competence, judgment, and suitability for such a critical post.

    New York is not an ordinary assignment. It is one of the most important diplomatic theaters in the world. Representing Türkiye there requires intellectual rigor, strategic awareness, and the willingness to confront hostile narratives head on especially when they emanate from within the diplomatic corps itself.

    At this critical moment, silence is not prudence. Silence is weakness.

    And weakness has no place in the representation of the Republic of Türkiye.

    Ibrahim Kurtulus

    Community Activist 

  • UK: Israel’s ambassador sorry over ‘take down’ Sir Alan Duncan comment

    UK: Israel’s ambassador sorry over ‘take down’ Sir Alan Duncan comment

    Israel’s ambassador to the UK has apologized after a senior member of his staff was secretly filmed saying he wanted to “take down” Foreign Office Minister Sir Alan Duncan.

    Israeli Embassy senior political officer Shai Masot made the comment in footage filmed in a London restaurant and obtained by the Mail on Sunday.

    He told a reporter that Sir Alan was creating “a lot of problems”.

    Ambassador Mark Regev said this was not the embassy or government’s view BBC reported.

    Secret recording

    The conversation involved Mr Masot and Maria Strizzolo, an aide to education minister Robert Halfon, the former political director of Conservative Friends of Israel, as well as an undercover reporter.

    It was recorded in October 2016 as part of an investigation by Al Jazeera.

    The BBC understands that Ms Strizzolo has resigned from the civil service.

    Mr Masot asked her: “Can I give you some names of MPs that I would suggest you take down?”

    Ms Strizzolo replied that all MPs have “something they’re trying to hide” and Mr Masot responded by saying “I have some MPs”, adding “she knows which MPs I want to take down” before specifying “the deputy foreign minister”.

    Sir Alan, who has described expanding Israeli settlements as a “stain on the face of the globe”, was seen as more of a problem than Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson – who was “basically good”, according to Mr Masot in a transcript of the conversation.

    “He just doesn’t care. He is an idiot but has become minister of foreign affairs without any responsibilities. If something real happened it won’t be his fault… it will be Alan Duncan.”

    Sir Alan launched a scathing attack on Israel in 2014, when MPs backed Palestinian statehood, deeming Israeli settlements as an “act of theft”.

    “Occupation, annexation, illegality, negligence, complicity – this is a wicked cocktail which brings shame on Israel,” he told BBC Radio 4’s World At One programme.

    Sir Alan, who was special envoy to Yemen and Oman at the time, said “international law must be upheld” to prevent further settlements.

    Labour has demanded an immediate inquiry into the extent of Israeli “interference” in British politics.

    Shadow foreign secretary Emily Thornberry said improper interference was “unacceptable whichever country was involved” adding Mr Masot’s comments were “extremely disturbing”.

    She said it was a national security issue and that the Foreign Office’s response was “not good enough”.

    ‘Completely unacceptable’

    Crispin Blunt, Foreign Affairs Select Committee chairman, said Mr Masot’s “apparent activity” was “formally outrageous and deserving of investigation”.

    But Sir Craig Oliver, David Cameron’s former communications director, said the undercover video was a “classic piece of mischief-making” by the Mail on Sunday.

    He told the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show that Mr Masot’s comments should be viewed as “extremely comic” rather than “extremely chilling”.

    “The Israeli government just wants to shut [the story] down,” he added. “It’s embarrassing”.

    Lord Stuart Polak, director of Conservative Friends of Israel, said: “We utterly condemn any attempt to undermine Sir Alan, or any minister, or any member of Parliament.”

    Ms Strizzolo told the newspaper that her conversation with Mr Masot was “tongue-in-cheek and gossipy”.

    In a statement, the Israeli Embassy said it “rejects the remarks concerning minister Duncan, which are completely unacceptable”.

    “The comments were made by a junior embassy employee who is not an Israeli diplomat, and who will be ending his term of employment with the embassy shortly,” it said.

    “Ambassador Regev on Friday spoke with minister Duncan, apologised for the comments and made clear that the embassy considered the remarks to be completely unacceptable.”

    A Foreign Office spokesman said: “The Israeli Ambassador has apologised and is clear these comments do not reflect the views of the embassy or government of Israel.

    “The UK has a strong relationship with Israel and we consider the matter closed.”

  • Civil servant resigns after discussing how to ‘take down pro-Palestine MPs’ with Israeli diplomat Footage secretly recorded by a media outlet appeared to show the civil servant discuss plans to ‘take down’ Tory MP

    Civil servant resigns after discussing how to ‘take down pro-Palestine MPs’ with Israeli diplomat Footage secretly recorded by a media outlet appeared to show the civil servant discuss plans to ‘take down’ Tory MP

    A former Westminster official has resigned after footage emerged appearing to show her discuss “taking down” pro-Palestinian MPs.

    According to Independent Maria Strizzolo, who is a former chief of staff to Conservative MP Robert Halfon, was recorded talking to Israeli embassy official Shai Masot.

    The footage, obtained by Al Jazeera, shows Mr. Masot say: “Can I give you some MPs that I would suggest you would take down?” In response, Ms Strizzolo appears to laugh, before responding: “Well you know, if you look hard enough, I’m sure there is something that they’re trying to hide.”

    Ms. Strizzolo has reportedly now resigned from her post at the Skills Funding Agency.

    Israel’s ambassador to the UK Mark Regev has apologized for Mr. Masot’s comments, describing them as “unacceptable”.

    Labour has demanded an investigation to probe alleged Israeli “interference” in British politics.

    During the conversation between the pair, which took place at the Aubaine restaurant near the Israeli embassy in Kensington, Mr. Masot also described Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson as “an idiot”.

    Ms. Strizzolo told the Mail on Sunday that her conversation with Mr. Masot was “tongue-in-cheek and gossipy”, adding: “Any suggestion that I … could exert the type of influence you are suggesting is risible.”

    She said she knew Mr. Masot “purely socially and as a friend. He is not someone with whom I have ever worked or had any political dealings beyond chatting about politics, as millions of people do, in a social context.”