Category: Culture/Art

  • The titles chosen by the Ottoman sultans, signifying their claim to the Roman legacy

    The titles chosen by the Ottoman sultans, signifying their claim to the Roman legacy

    1. Mehmed II “Sultan of the two lands, Emperor of the two seas, and Emperor of Rome” “Sultan of two lands, Emperor of two seas, and Emperor of Rome.” “Heir to the realm of Caesar”=>
    2. Suleiman I Among the titles used by Suleiman the Magnificent in his letters to European rulers: “I, the Emperor of Rome…”
    3. Bayezid II “Basileus Basileon” (“King of Kings”“Megistos Basileus” (“The Greatest Emperor”)

    =======================

    Suleiman I (Suleiman the Magnificent)

    II Beyazıt

  • The Uzun Hüseyin Well

    The Uzun Hüseyin Well

    The Uzun Hüseyin Well, discovered during excavations in Hakmehmet village, where 83 people were allegedly murdered and thrown into the well, reveals the Armenian atrocities that took place in the region.

    The well, approximately 13 meters deep, is located on land belonging to Hüseyin Duman, nicknamed “Uzun Hüseyin,” who lived in Hakmehmet village.

    According to historical sources and accounts from the local people, in 1919, thousands of Armenians who came to the region gathered all the men from the families living in the village in the village square, using various tricks or coercion.

    The Armenian gangs tied the hands of those gathered there, tortured some to death, and threw others alive into the well. Hüseyin Duman, who was thrown into the well during the massacre perpetrated by the Armenians and managed to escape, ensured that the events of that day became known to this day.

    Uzun Hüseyin‘s son, Felemez Duman, recounted his father’s and the villagers’ experiences during the massacre perpetrated by the Armenians. Duman, who still lives in a house next to the mass grave, said, “My father used to say that Armenians surrounded the village, raided everyone’s houses, gathered all the men in the mosque, and tied the hands of the elders. My father told the others, ‘Let‘s escape,’ thinking, ’Our relatives, our families are here, what will happen to them?’ My father managed to escape, and they fired a few shots after him, but they missed.” Duman explained that his father hid in the barn because he couldn’t leave the village due to the Armenian guards around him, and continued, “They brought the men they had tied up to the well near the barn, threw them into the well one by one, some headfirst, and shot them. Finally, they covered them with stones. My mother used to say that we escaped, we survived, we went to Iran, and after a long time, we returned to our village, and blood was still coming out of the well.”

  • How to Rewrite History, Distortion of Reality: Armenian Lesson

    How to Rewrite History, Distortion of Reality: Armenian Lesson

    This book critically examines the global campaign to label the 1915 Ottoman relocation of Armenians as “genocide,” arguing that such a designation lacks both legal foundation and historical accuracy. Drawing upon primary academic sources, international law instruments, and archival documents, the study deconstructs the ideological mechanisms used to rewrite history through selective narratives and politicized memory.The book argues that the portrayal of the 1915 events as “genocide” is a product of political lobbying, diaspora activism, and a growing trend of parliaments assuming judicial roles in historical controversies. Relying on the Genocide Convention of 1948, the principle of non-retroactivity, and the doctrine of legal positivism, the study finds that the events fail to meet the definitional threshold of genocide under international law.Furthermore, the research explores how diaspora-driven narratives, coupled with terrorism and propaganda during the 20th century, have reshaped public memory and influenced parliamentary decisions in especially Western states. The misuse of legislative platforms to issue historically and legally non-binding declarations on “genocide” is identified as a distortion of both history and justice.This book provides a legal, historical, and political refutation of the genocide allegations by examining both Turkish and Western scholarly perspectives. It offers a “lesson” in how history can be manipulated for ideological ends, emphasizing the importance of juridical processes, objective scholarship, and archival integrity in confronting such claims.
    AYACADEMY

    Serkan KORKMAZ

  • Mustafa Kemal Ataturk: A Childhood Recollection

    Mustafa Kemal Ataturk: A Childhood Recollection

    On the eve of the 21st century, Turkey is celebrating the uninterrupted 75th anniversary of her foundation (29 October 1923) and commemorating the 60th anniversary of the death of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (in November 1938). The man who founded modern Turkey, the successful fighter against European colonialism, was at 35 years of age, the youngest general of World War I and the hero of the Gallipoli campaign. Even today I remember how we Turks mourned him as though we had all lost our father. There are not many of his contemporaries alive today, but there are many of my generation who saw him in their youth or childhood. I am one of them.

    My encounter with Ataturk occurred in elementary school. The year was 1937 or 1938. News of his visit brought excitement to the school. The blackboards were painted and even inaccessible corners were cleaned. The school administration distributed new history texts to each class. The text was written by Afet Inan, ‘a liberated woman historian’, whom Ataturk admired. The students became impatient. Each wanted to see him, while the teachers, overcome with emotion, wanted to be relieved of their classroom duties.

    There were some descendants of famous personalities scattered in various classes. The school administration took care to make their classrooms especially attractive. Still we had a little bit of hope in our class. According to our teacher, if he was to be believed, Ataturk would not overlook our class since our teacher fought in Ataturk’s army during the war for independence, 1920-1922. As rumour of his impending arrival spread, Ataturk appeared at the end of the week. We were studying Turkish history exclusively that day. We did not hear Ataturk arrive but realized something was happening because of the commotion in the corridor. Every eye turned to the windows with a view of the corridor. There was no doubt that Ataturk was here. Our teacher counselled us to avoid losing our heads in the excitement. 


    Ataturk’s presence did not raze my classmate at the neighbouring desk. He had a mania for copying secretly from a book which he kept on his lap during examinations. Even in a subject in which he was well versed, he preferred to copy. When he filled in his name, date of birth, and address, he would glance at his identity card and copy. Cheating was a game for him. Ataturk’s presence did not dissuade him from keeping his copy book on his lap. He was the type who would be proud to say later ‘You see, nobody would dare cheat in Ataturk’s presence but me.’

    Meanwhile, Ataturk and his party had gathered in the corridor. Ataturk was in the middle, flanked by the senior school administrators. The remainder of the group followed at least two steps behind them. Then the door opened wide and Ataturk entered with his entourage. We all stood at attention just like soldiers. As we jumped to attention, the book fell from my classmate’s lap. He blushed with embarrassment. Fortunately, no one noticed in the excitement.

    Ataturk told our teacher to seat us, which he did. Our teacher then bowed, not extremely low, but at just the right height and introduced himself rather modestly as ‘Your obedient teacher in history’. Since he was a member of the board of education as well, we were astounded that he referred to himself as merely a teacher. Perhaps Ataturk would have questioned him more diligently if he had known of the teacher’s other responsibilities. Ataturk asked him ‘Do you teach from the book or from your own concept?’ The principal and the teacher answered simultaneously ‘From the book’ as they tried to prevent him from asking ‘From which book?”Very nice’ replied Ataturk with a glance at the text book on the desk. Had he asked us about anything in that book, we would have been dumfounded. Thank heaven, he didn’t. The principal and the teachers explained the curriculum to Ataturk to change the subject.

    I had seen a picture of Ataturk. He posed with two fingers in his waistcoat pocket, his head bent slightly forward. ‘To look at him directly is difficult. To look in his eyes is impossible. If you look at any more than his chin, you will be dazzled by the reflections from his eyes and lose consciousness as though you were struck by lightning’. This was common folk wisdom so I didn’t dare raise my head to look at his face. What I could see was his watch chain, waistcoat, two fingers of his left hand in his pocket, his collar and part of his chin but the Devil made me suddenly glance a little higher. I saw no dazzle nor did lightning strike. Even the principal and the teacher could look into his eyes with no ill effects. 
    Dazzling reflections and lightning were exaggerations but the stare from those eyes was unusual. The eyes stared into space; they seemed to focus at great distances and peer into wide chasms. Even a child could not fail to notice that nothing escaped those eyes. No one could deceive this man. He was unimpressed by bombast. He was extraordinary. Nobody was required to tell him what needed to be done. Those who attempted to deceive him appeared to be merely superfluous, thoughtless, unseemly or presumptuous. That is why the principal and the teacher were so ridiculous in his presence. He did not need their briefing. What he should have been told he already knew.

    I am still convinced today of the correctness of those childhood impressions. I recently read a 1941 publication about Ataturk’s conversation with General MacArthur when MacArthur visited Istanbul in 1931. In his diary MacArthur noted that even before Hitler’s rise to power in Germany Ataturk had prophesied that World War II would begin in Europe between 1941-1945. He also foresaw that the United States could not maintain its neutrality and that the first victor in Europe would be Bolshevik Russia rather than England, France, or Germany.

    Everything happened exactly as he had prophesied. He knew that teachers would give him evasive answers; that a book would fall from the lap of a blushing student; and that a newly introduced unopened book would be presented to him as a traditional text. He knew all that in the early morning prior to his departure from his residence at Bosporus. For such a man there are no surprises.

    To avoid embarrassing his hosts he always appeared to be listening to their presentations but he could not wipe the sardonic expression from his face. I noticed how his cold blue eyes, arched eyebrows and thin lips produced an expression that said: ‘Tell me Mister, what kind of text book do you really use? I already know what district you’re from; what your favourite flavour is; and what kind of coffee you drink and whether you take it with cream or sugar.’

    I asked myself why Ataturk didn’t perceive the sanctimoniousness of the selfish sycophants around him when he was able to look into the bottom of their souls. Some time later I realized the answer. Ataturk was not deceived by the games they were playing. He was just toying with them. Nothing is as ridiculous as a confidence man being duped by his intended victim.

    After paying quick visits to two other classes, he and his entourage visited the principal’s office. Before he left the office, Ataturk autographed a photograph of himself. No sooner had he left the office when two blustering teaching assistants slipped in and lunged toward the cigarette butt Ataturk had left in an ashtray. They argued over who would smoke Ataturk’s cigarette butt and finally agreed to share it in the hope that each would inhale some of Ataturk’s ingenuity. I thought both would now be on a fast track to a ministerial post. Alas, that was not to be. One became a customs officer and the other headed a small municipal office.

    As the teaching assistants fantasized about their future, Ataturk prepared to leave. His departure was announced and we all rushed into the schoolyard. After conferring with his aides, Ataturk decided to mingle with the student body. He left his aides behind and plunged into the crowd. We all marched with him to the main entrance, which was used only on ceremonial occasions. The young students moved in every direction, some even creeping backwards like lobsters to look at his face. Ataturk was unperturbed and strode resolutely ahead.

    Curious spectators appeared by the thousands at the school entrance. Police officers had great difficulty keeping the crowd from spilling into the street. Every window with a view was crammed with faces struggling for a glimpse. When Ataturk appeared on the street, the crowd began applauding. Exulted by the applause, he entered his automobile and departed, flanked by a motorized escort. His entourage followed with great difficulty as the swarming crowd impeded the passage of their vehicles.

    That evening the attendance list was checked. Two sly foxes were found to have exploited the occasion and skipped school that day. I don’t remember if they were punished. I think missing that historic day was punishment enough.

    Azmi Guran. Ph.D., Prof.El.Eng. (University of Pennsylvania)

  • Nadine Sultana d’Osman Han

    Nadine Sultana d’Osman Han

    Nadine Sultana d’Osman Han (henceforth, “Nadine Sultana”) is the daughter of the late Selim bin Hamid Han (henceforth “Prince Selim”), son of Ottoman Sultan Abdulhamid II and his spouse, Seniha Zill-i Sultan, a Persian Princess. 

    Prince Selim  started his journey into exile due to the collapse of the Ottoman Empire.  First to Egypt then France, upon the overthrow of the Khedive Dynasty. 

    In the spring of 1940 while visiting France, Prince Selim with his spouse, a native to Brittany, were unable to return to Egypt due to World War II. Thus, Nadine Sultana and her three siblings were born in France.

    In 1946, they were able to return to Alexandria, Egypt. Then, between 1948 and 1952 a cholera epidemic and political turmoil causing King Farouk’s exile, sent the family back to France where they remained. 

    Nadine Sultana studied in France, England and the US with emphasis in the political sciences, journalism and art in which she holds a degree.  History has always been a great part of Nadine Sultana interests, 

    particularly the history of Persia, the Ottoman Empire and Turkey. Deeply spiritual in Sufi theology, Nadine Sultana devoted her life to bringing awareness to human sufferings through numerous international humanitarian conferences in which she was a speaker. 

    Her intensive research into social ills and cultural diversity brought her to many parts of the World from the Silk Road in Central Asia to the Middle East, Africa and Europe. 

    When she was 20 years old, while still a student in England, Nadine Sultana married an officer in the US Air Force who was training in France during the Vietnam era.  Now married for 60 years, they have two wonderful and successful children and currently reside in the US. 

    From 1991-1997, while still holding the French citizenship, Nadine Sultana was elected as the French Representative delegate of New Mexico for the “Conseil Supérieur des Français de l’Étranger” under the western jurisdiction of the US.

    From 1999-2005, Nadine Sultana was honorary vice-president and advisor for the International Qajar Studies Association as well as a contributor to its Journal.

    From 2000-2020, until the COVID pandemic, Nadine Sultana was a UN NGO/DPI, Councilor for the World Council of Muslim Communities.

    Nadine Sultana was also an advisor for Kamilat, a Sufi organization.  

    Nadine Sultana is a published author, a limited-edition publisher and an artist. 

  • Creation in the Quran

    Creation in the Quran

    Testing AI, first question: creation in the Quran; composed it instantly

    The Qur’anic view of creation emphasizes a purposeful, deliberate, and intricate process through which God (Allah) brought the universe into existence. It is a perspective that reflects divine wisdom, power, and transcendence. Here are some of the key themes:

    ### 1. **Creation by God’s Will and Command**

    In the Qur’an, creation is often described as being initiated by God’s command. God says, *“Be!”* and it is. This emphasizes the sovereignty of God in bringing the universe into being with a single utterance. For instance:

    * **Surah Al-Baqarah (2:117)**: *“The Originator of the heavens and the earth. When He decrees a matter, He only says to it, ‘Be,’ and it is.”*

    This reflects God’s omnipotence and the simplicity of His command.

    ### 2. **Creation in Stages**

    The Qur’an suggests that creation was carried out in stages, which parallels some modern scientific understandings of cosmology (though the Qur’an doesn’t use modern terminology). It speaks about the heavens and the earth being initially a unified mass before God separated them:

    * **Surah Al-Anbiya (21:30)**: *“Do not those who disbelieve see that the heavens and the earth were a closed-up mass, then We opened them out?…”*

    The idea of the heavens and earth being once a “closed-up mass” suggests a primordial state of the universe, before God caused the differentiation.

    ### 3. **Creation of the Universe, Earth, and Life**

    The Qur’an offers descriptions of the creation of the universe, the Earth, and life forms. The creation of the Earth and its balance is seen as an act of divine design:

    * **Surah An-Naba (78:6-7)**: *“Have We not made the earth as a bed, and the mountains as pegs?”*

    These verses emphasize the Earth’s stable foundation and the presence of harmony in nature, a theme repeated throughout the Qur’an.

    The creation of life, including humans, is also carefully detailed. The creation of Adam, the first human, is a special and significant event, showing humanity’s direct creation by God. The Qur’an describes the creation of Adam from clay:

    * **Surah Sad (38:71-72)**: *“When your Lord said to the angels, ‘I am creating a human being from clay, from molded mud…’”*

    Adam’s creation is unique because God breathes His spirit into him, making humans special among all creation.

    ### 4. **Purpose and Intention of Creation**

    The Qur’an stresses that creation is not random but purposeful. Everything in the universe has a reason for its existence, and its purpose is to reflect God’s glory and serve humanity’s needs. Humans are reminded that their creation is meant to acknowledge the sovereignty of God, live righteous lives, and steward the earth.

    * **Surah Adh-Dhariyat (51:56)**: *“I did not create jinn and mankind except to worship Me.”*

    Humanity’s role is to serve as caretakers of the Earth, living in harmony with God’s will.

    ### 5. **The Creation of Humans**

    The Qur’an also offers a detailed account of the creation of humanity. Adam’s creation was followed by the creation of his mate, Eve (Hawwa), and the story of their fall from paradise serves as a foundational narrative for human life on Earth. The Qur’an does not focus on the literal, material details of creation but on the spiritual significance and lessons:

    * **Surah Al-A’raf (7:19-22)**: *“And O Adam, dwell, you and your wife, in Paradise and eat from wherever you wish, but do not approach this tree, lest you be among the wrongdoers.”*

    This passage, among others, shows the relationship between humanity and the divine, emphasizing free will, responsibility, and the consequences of disobedience.

    ### 6. **The Role of Angels and Divine Guidance**

    The Qur’an speaks of angels as the ones who carry out God’s commands. They play significant roles in creation, maintaining order in the universe, and delivering divine messages to prophets. For instance, they were involved in the creation of Adam:

    * **Surah Al-Baqarah (2:30)**: *“And when your Lord said to the angels, ‘Indeed, I will make upon the earth a vicegerent.’”*

    This verse illustrates the idea that humans are placed on Earth to be God’s representatives (khalifah), with a duty to uphold justice, peace, and righteousness.

    ### 7. **Creation as a Sign of God’s Existence and Power**

    The Qur’an encourages reflection on the natural world as a sign of God’s existence and majesty. Everything in creation is seen as a symbol pointing to the Creator. The vastness of the universe, the intricacies of life, the cycles of nature—these are all signs that people are urged to contemplate.

    * **Surah Al-Imran (3:190-191)**: *“Indeed, in the creation of the heavens and the earth, and the alternation of the night and the day, are signs for those of understanding.”*

    ### 8. **Life, Death, and Resurrection**

    The Qur’an emphasizes that life and death are part of a larger divine plan. Life is given by God, and it is He who will cause death, followed by resurrection. Creation, in this sense, is a dynamic process, with human beings living through cycles of life and death, and eventually being resurrected for accountability in the afterlife:

    * **Surah Al-Mulk (67:2)**: *“It is He who created death and life to test you \[as to] which of you is best in deed…”*

    The ultimate purpose of creation, for humans, is to worship God and live according to His guidance, with the final goal being eternal life in the hereafter.

    ### Conclusion

    The Qur’anic view of creation presents a universe that is the result of divine will and purpose, where everything has its place and role. Humans are created with dignity and responsibility, entrusted with stewardship over the Earth, and are guided by divine revelation. The universe, in all its complexity, is seen as a sign of God’s greatness and a means by which believers can come closer to Him.

    Created by  CHATGPT.  5/14/25
    aydan mahoney