Month: December 2008

  • Pre-Ottoman and Ottoman Symposium in Bishkek, Aug. 24-29, 2009

    Pre-Ottoman and Ottoman Symposium in Bishkek, Aug. 24-29, 2009

    Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University

    International Committee of Pre-Ottoman and Ottoman Studies (CIEPO)

    Interim Symposium

    On the Central Asiatic Roots of the Pre-Ottoman and Ottoman Culture
    August 24-29, 2009, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan

    First Circular

    We are pleased to announce that the CIEPO Symposium on the Central
    Asiatic Roots of the pre-Ottoman and Ottoman Culture will be held at
    Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University, Bishkek, 24-29 August, 2009.

    The Organizing Committee calls for your presentation of current
    research on the Central Asiatic roots of the pre-Ottoman and Ottoman
    culture related to the themes of administrative, social, economic,
    military,  political aspects, as well as medicine, science,
    architecture, education, trade, historiography, literature and
    international relations.

    Individual papers will be organized into sections by the Organizing
    Committee.  Abstracts for individual papers should not exceed 300
    words. The desirable duration of a paper presentation is 15 minutes;
    it should not exceed 20 minutes. In case it becomes necessary to limit
    the number of papers, the selection will be made by members of the
    Organizing Committee.

    Pre-organized panels/sessions and thematic workshops should consist of
    two to three papers, plus an analysis of them by a discussant (or a
    designated chair) of ten to fifteen minutes maximum length. The papers
    should center on a single theme or question, and the panel proposal
    should include an abstract (300 words maximum) for the entire panel
    explaining its theme and rationale and how the individual papers
    contribute to that theme, in addition to an individual abstract (300
    words maximum) for each paper.  In case it becomes necessary to limit
    the number of papers, the selection will be made by members of the
    Organizing Committee.

    The participants are requested to send Registration Form by the end of
    December 2008 (request by email from organizers).  The deadline for
    the paper titles and abstracts and/or the initial proposals and
    abstracts for pre-organized sessions and workshops abstracts is by the
    end of January 2009.

    The symposium languages are English, French, German and Turkish.

    Participants are requested to finance their own travel expenses and
    accommodation. The registration fee for the symposium is 50 (USD)
    which should be paid to the accounts opened on behalf of the CIEPO (we
    expect to give the name of bank and account number in 2nd circular).
    The CIEPO membership should be paid 10 (USD) in advance as well.

    The fees are intended to cover the expenses of lunch, farewell dinner
    and excursion. The details about accommodation options (with prices)
    will be provided also in the 2nd circular).

    Sincerely yours,

    Ilhan SAHIN
    On behalf of Organizing Committee

    Please submit your registration form and proposals to:
    E-mails: [email protected]
    or [email protected]
    Tel.  00996 (312) 49 27 83 (internal number 12 03 and 12 06)
    Fax: 00996 (312) 49 27 82

    Presidents
    Prof. Dr. Suleyman KAYIPOV (Manas University, Rector)
    Prof. Dr. Ugur ORAL (Manas University, Deputy Rector)

    Organizing Committee
    Prof. Dr. Dilaram ALIMOVA (Uzbekstan)
    Prof. Dr. Remzi ATAOGLU (Turkey)
    Prof. Dr. Tuncer BAYKARA (Turkey)
    Prof. Dr. Victor BUTANAYEV (Russia)
    Prof. Dr. Jean-Louis BACQUÉ-GRAMMONT (France)
    Prof. Dr. Cenis CUNUSALIYEV (Kyrgyzstan)
    Prof. Dr. Rémy DORE (France)
    Prof. Dr. Hikari EGAWA (Japan)
    Prof. Dr. Feridun EMECEN (Turkey)
    Prof. Dr. Yuliy HUDYAKOV (Russia)
    Prof. Dr. Mushtaq A. KAW (India)
    Prof. Dr. Olcobay KARATEEV (Kyrgyzstan)
    Prof. Dr. Sergei KLASTORNIY (Russia)
    Prof. Dr. Dariusz KOLODZIEJCZYK (Poland)
    Prof. Dr. Hisao KOMATSU (Japan)
    Prof. Dr. Bulat KUMEKOV (Kazakhstan)
    Prof. Dr. Heat LOWRY (USA)
    Prof. Dr. Anvarbek MOKEEV (Kyrgyzstan)
    Prof. Dr. Ilber ORTAYLI (Turkey)
    Prof. Dr. Ajay PATNAIK (India)
    Prof. Dr. Tadashi SUZUKI (Japan)
    Prof. Dr. Ilhan SAHIN (Turkey), General Secretary of CIEPO
    Prof. Dr. Ahmet TASAGIL (Turkey)

    Excursion program being planned for the congress participants

    – Nevaket – archeological complex ruins of the medieval city of
       Turkic rulers of the 6th-12th century (Chuy valley)
    – Site of ancient settlement Ak-Beshim – ruins of the medieval city
       Suyab. The capital of Western Turks, Turgesh and Karluk states (VI-Xth
       century, Chuy valley)
    – Burana -archeological and architectural complex of 10th-12th
       century: The capital of Karahanid state (Chuy valley)
    – Suusamir- summer quarters of the Avrasya nomads
    – Koksay – location of Ancient Turkic runic inscriptions of the 8th
       century
    (Kochkor valley, Naryn oblast)
    – Rock painting gallery Cholpon Ata- petroglyphs of the ancient Iron
       Age and Medieval Age, Northern shore of the Issyk-Kol lake
    – Royal kurgans of Issyk Kol- funeral constructions of the ancient
       Saka society aristocracy
    – The Ferghana Valley – historically most important staging-post on
       the so-called Silk Road for goods and people travelling from China to
       the Middle East & Europe

  • GUENTER LEWY  SUES SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER

    GUENTER LEWY SUES SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER

    Not a day passes when someone from the AFATH community (Armenian Falsifiers and Turks-Haters) doesn’t demonize Turks, Turkey, Turkish-Americans and/or friends of Turkey. 

    Forgetting that there are no substantiations by historical evidence for their political claims other than hearsay, forgeries, and partisan interpretations of wartime human suffering and ignoring that there are no court verdicts by competent tribunals to support  their accusations, these genocide lynch mobs arrogantly resort to insults, slanders, and threats.  They think they are protected under freedom of expression, but the question begs to be asked:

    Are obvious insults, malicious slanders, direct threats, and/or other similar hate speech protected under the U.S. constitution? 

    Gregory Lisby, a communications professor at Georgia State University, who has tracked criminal libel prosecutions and found 17 states that had not updated laws from English common law.  His research revealed that that criminal libel cases have dropped but he says the Internet could reverse that.  His words:  “More and more people view the online world as a free-rant place…They think it’s par for the course, but they’re setting themselves up for lawsuits or prosecution”

     (Source: “Colorado man faces criminal charge in libel case”, by Times Staff writer Nicholas Riccardi, Los Angels Times, December 4, 2008)

    I know several of these cyber-thugs, myself,  who insult me personally, attack me without even knowing me based on my ethnic heritage and the views I hold of my own family’s history.  And these insults, slanders, and threats come to me not in just one or two postings, but in majority if not all of postings.    I reserve my right to defend myself against these cyber-thugs. 

    Last October and November, I was attacked in many blogs for organizing a fund-raiser for a political candidate out of my district.  I figured, if one businessman (Daryl Issa) can spend his own money and succeed in replacing a sitting California Governor (Gray Davis), then why cannot another one (i.e. yours truly) replace a sitting congressman (Adam Schiff?) 

    Do I need to explain myself to anyone what politician, when, and why I should support? 

    Or do I need to get permission from my political adversaries to do so? 

    Isn’t fundraising one of the most cherished ways of participating in the political process?  Isn’t such participation encouraged, revered, and protected in the U.S. constitution?

    Why the strange efforts to show this American practice as something clandestine, dangerous, vile, or otherwise undesirable?

    Isn’t anti-Turkish bias, bigotry and hatred as well as ethnic and religious discrimination at work here?

    Hold those thoughts as I would like to bring to your attention the following press release I received today.

    Let’s read:

    ***

    PRESS RELEASE

    Washington, DC, December 3, 2008: On November 17, 2008 Professor Guenter Lewy filed a defamation suit against the Southern Poverty Law Center, Inc., and writer-editor David Holthouse in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, supported by the Turkish American Legal Defense Fund. TALDF seeks to preserve and promote open discourse about issues significant for Turkish Americans, including the characterization of the events bearing on the World War I deaths of Ottoman Muslims and Armenians.

    Among other works, Professor Lewy is author of The Armenian Massacres in Ottoman Turkey: A Disputed Genocide (University of Utah Press, 2005), which concludes that the evidence to support the popular allegation of genocide in the Armenian case is inconclusive.

    The defamation claims pivot on twin false assertions made by Defendant Holthouse in an article published in the Summer 2008 issue of Intelligence Report entitled, “State of Denial: Turkey Entices U.S. Scholars, Law Makers to Cover Up Armenian Genocide.” The first was the false statement that Professor Lewy was on the payroll of the Government of Turkey in exchange for compromising his scholastic integrity in disputing the Armenian allegation of genocide. The second was that Professor Lewy deceived his readers or audiences by failing to disclose the money he had received from the Government of Turkey to shape his view of the Armenian claim. The false statements also insinuated that Professor Lewy had violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act by failing to register with the Department of Justice as a mouthpiece for the Government of Turkey. Professor Lewy is seeking damages to clear his good name and to send a message that sham accusations of being on the take is not an acceptable substitute for reasoned and civil debate over genuine historical controversies. The climate of intimidation, coercion and worse that confronts anyone who quarrels with the Armenian view of the events of 1915 in the Ottoman Empire must end.

    Professor Lewy is being represented by attorneys Bruce Fein and David Saltzman on behalf of the Turkish American Legal Defense Fund.

    ***

     

  • Can Turkey’s AKP Survive the Upcoming Local Elections?

    Can Turkey’s AKP Survive the Upcoming Local Elections?

    Publication: Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume: 5 Issue: 230
    December 3, 2008 10:15 AM Age: 1 days
    Category: Eurasia Daily Monitor, Turkey, Domestic/Social
    By: Saban Kardas
    Turkish politics is entering a new era of contestation and heightened debate with the approach of the March 2009 municipal elections. The influence of partisan politics in local elections is usually moderate, but Turkish experts generally believe that municipal elections have been shaped by trends in national politics. When they are held right before parliamentary elections, they have served as “opinion polls” and signaled the winners. When held after parliamentary elections, local elections have functioned as vote of confidence for the incumbents (Radikal, November 23). In that sense, their meaning goes well beyond electing the next mayor or city councilman; they have come to pose serious tests to governing parties. The AKP passed such a test with great success: after its landslide electoral victory in the November 2002 general elections, there were questions on the part of the secular elites about how the AKP would govern Turkey, given its origins in previously-banned Islamic parties. The results of the March 2004 municipal elections, in which the AKP increased its strength, served as a reaffirmation of popular support for the AKP’s policies, removing many of the remaining objections to the new government. Since its electoral victory in the July 2007 general elections, many new issues have arisen; and the AKP has been consumed by domestic political developments, as well as the impending economic crisis. The local elections might be another opportunity for it to gain fresh legitimacy.

    The first challenge to the AKP is on the issue of reforms. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his AKP have been criticized by pro-reform circles as well as EU officials for slowing down domestic transformation. After coming to power in 2003, the AKP implemented drastic changes in the country’s economic and political structures, preparing the ground for the start of EU accession negotiations in 2005. Since then, domestic transformation has been relegated to a secondary status on Erdogan’s agenda. Particularly after the Constitutional Court’s controversial decision on the closure case against the AKP, which fell short of shutting down the party yet imposed fines for being a center of anti-secular activities, Erdogan appears to have completely abandoned the political reform project, including making a new, more liberal constitution.

    Reformers have been troubled by Erdogan’s close relationship with the new military leadership (Taraf, October 17). The EU officials have also criticized the Erdogan government for seeking to substitute its foreign policy activism for domestic reforms (www.fox.com.tr, November 27). Even his own supporters have started to raise objections to Erdogan’s new style in government, reflecting the dissatisfaction among the AKP’s core constituencies as well (www.ntvmsnbc.com, November 6). Despite mounting criticism, Erdogan has insisted on the rectitude of its policies. Against this background of AKP soul-searching on the political spectrum, the local elections will put to test Erdogan’s nationalist and pro-status quo political platform and his confrontational leadership style (Today’s Zaman, November 29).

    Another major challenge is the electoral battle in southeastern Turkey, which is predominantly populated by Kurdish-speaking voters. Since the July 2007 elections, the AKP has sought to project itself as the representative of the entire political spectrum in Turkey, including conservative Turks, liberal reformists, and Kurds. As a matter of fact, the AKP came out as the first party in ballots in the Kurdish provinces. Since then, the AKP’s motto has been “We will win Diyarbakir too” (Aksam, December 4, 2007), which implied that the AKP was intent on winning the major provincial municipalities controlled by the pro-Kurdish nationalist Democratic Society Party (DTP). The AKP’s aspirations to be an all-encompassing party, coupled with Erdogan’s increasingly pro-nationalist discourse, pitted it against the DTP.

    Erdogan had continuously claimed that the AKP abhorred identity politics and any form of ethnic, regional, or religious nationalism (Anadolu Ajansi, June 4, 2006). Ironically, through its antagonism toward the DTP, the AKP might have triggered just such identity politics. The growing tension between the two parties over their competition for Kurdish votes accounts for much of the street violence in the eastern and western parts of Turkey, as well as the radicalization of Kurdish and Turkish nationalist sentiments. Some Turkish political observers believe that the AKP might have fallen into the DTP’s trap by going along with the latter’s confrontational approach (www.haber7.com, November 29). Local elections in the region will partly demonstrate whether the people will support the DTP or the AKP— in other words, solving the Kurdish problem through meeting their demands for more political and ethnic rights versus solving the problem by providing more social and economic development projects in Kurdish areas.

    The AKP government has also come under criticism for its delayed response to the financial crisis, which is another major source of challenge. Initially, the government maintained that Turkey might escape the effects of the global crisis and resisted the calls for seeking international assistance. Recently, the government came to terms with the reality of the economic crisis and initiated negotiations with the IMF. Experts argue that short of an agreement with the IMF, the Turkish economy might undergo a serious recession (Referans, December 3). In the meantime, the crisis has affected the production sector, with some industries starting to shut down their plants and lay off workers or put them on unpaid vacation (Referans, October 27, November 11). After all, the AKP came to power as a result of its rivals’ failed economic policies, and it has been able to hold on to power thanks to its successful handling of the economy. If massive unemployment were to break out, it might have devastating consequences for the AKP’s performance in the elections. Nonetheless, experts note that it may be too early to tell how far the economic crisis will go and whether it may affect voting behavior. They note in particular that the Turkish people are aware that the current crisis has been caused by the global financial system; hence, people might not necessarily rush to blame the AKP government for the sagging economy (Milliyet, December 3).

    Despite its shortcomings, the AKP, like Erdogan for that matter, is far from being a lame duck. It still has several weapons in its arsenal. First, given Turkey’s unitary state structure, the central government controls enormous resources. As the incumbent party, it could channel resources to alleviate the conditions of crisis-stricken segments of society, preventing erosion in popular support. Second, the AKP and its predecessors made their reputations through their successful track record in local government, and the Turkish electorate still recognizes them as the “party of services.” Finally, the opposition parties are in complete disarray, and there is still no plausible alternative on the horizon that has the capability to knock the AKP down.

  • Azerbaijan Consulate General in Kars inaugurates its new administrative building

    Azerbaijan Consulate General in Kars inaugurates its new administrative building

    Kars–APA. Azerbaijan Consulate General in Kars, Turkey inaugurated its new administrative building, Azerbaijan Press Council told APA.

    Leading media representatives, non-governmental organizations and public and political figures attended the ceremony. Welcoming the participants Azerbaijan’s Consul General in Kars Hasan Zeynalov spoke about the consulate’s 4-year activity. Azerbaijan’s Consul General in Istanbul Sayyad Aran focused on the ceremony’s role in the deepening of Turkey-Azerbaijan friendship. Member of Azerbaijani Parliament Nizami Khudiyev, Chairman of the Azerbaijan Press Council Aflatun Amashov, Deputy Foreign Minister of Azerbaijan Vagif Sadigov, Governor of Igdir City Saim Safffet Karahisarli, Governor of Kars Mehmet Ufuk Erden and others called the ceremony as a historic event for both Kars and Azerbaijan. Azerbaijani journalists began their tour on Igdir and Kars on the Press Council’s initiative on December 2. Representatives of the non-governmental organizations and members of the Azerbaijani parliament were also included in the delegation. On Wednesday the delegation leaves for Igdir, where the monument of Azerbaijani martyrs will be opened on December 4.

  • French government protests law that punishes persons for denying so-called “Armenian genocide”

    French government protests law that punishes persons for denying so-called “Armenian genocide”

    Paris–APA. French government for the first time protested the law that punishes persons for denying so-called “Armenian genocide” at the Senate. Responding the socialist lawmaker Rene Roger’s question on this issue, Secretary of State for the interior and local authorities Alain Marleix said the government did not intend to bring this law approved by the lower chamber of the parliament to the Senate’s agenda. The minister said the parliament shouldn’t interfere in the work of historians and if the law was adopted it would cause serious protest from Turkey.
    Lower chamber of the French parliament approved the law for punishment of persons denying the so-called “Armenian genocide” on October 12, 2006 proposed by the Socialist party. According to the law the person denying the so-called genocide can be sentenced for a year of imprisonment or 45 thousand euro fine.

     

  • Poor Richard’s Report

    Poor Richard’s Report

    Poor  Richard’s Report            over 300,000 readers 

    Federal Reserve will take Charge of the US Treasury Department

    These are exciting times we are now experiencing.

    We will have a new president who was one of the most liberal US Senators.

    We have a global economy that is heading into a more pronounced recession.

    We have a stock market that is the most volatile in US history.

    The president-elect is really pulling some magic tricks out of his hat in naming some of his advisors. The conservative media is having a field day comparing some of these cabinet picks to advisors of the past presidencies of Lincoln, Wilson, and Harry Truman. Not a bad group to be identified with, in my opinion.

    The way I see things, Obama really wants differing views so that he can be fully informed. He now represents all the people of this country, and as president he will only know what his advisors tell him. He is going to be one busy fellow. The last thing he needs is a bunch of back slappers wanting to please him with empty praise.

    Our foreign adversaries will be in a quandary- there will be no record- so no one will know how big a stick this Magician carries. The Iranians thought they would be better off with Reagan instead of Carter and Saddam Hussein totally misjudged GW Bush. Does the Magician have a wizard’s wand or just a big stick?

    What really intrigues me is the appointment of Paul Volker as head of his economic team. He has been on the White house staff since President Eisenhower. He was President of the Federal Reserve Bank of NY in the 1970’s.  That is the most powerful of the reserve banks. The President is automatically Vice Chairman of the FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee). All members rotate and the chairman is appointed by the President and approved by the Senate for a six-year term. The Vice Chairman position belongs to the President of the NY Federal Reserve Bank. All fed trades are done through this bank. Currencies, bonds, money supply – you name it. All central banks know and respect the President of the NY Fed.

    So when William G. Miller, the Federal Reserve Chairman under Jimmy Carter, was flooding the world with US dollars to compete with OPEC, they eventually realized they were getting worthless inflated dollars. So they demanded that they be paid with a basket of dollars. One problem, there was not enough currencies to match the US dollars. An economic apocalypse was right around the corner.         

                 En masse they went to Jimmy Carter and demanded Paul Volker. Miller resigned on a Wednesday and Carter named Volker.  The US Senate approved Volker by voice vote on Thursday and the new Fed Chairman flew to Brussels that night to assure the central bankers. Saturday he returned and announced that the Federal Reserve would now tighten the money supply until inflation was beaten. He then raised the Discount Rate, which is the rate at which banks can borrow from the Fed.

                    While in Washington fighting inflation, the Federal Reserve Chairman rented a dorm room at Georgetown University. On weekends he would go to NYC to spend time with is ill wife.

                    He is a no nonsense man and everyone knew exactly where he stood and respected him for it.

                    When his term was up under Ronald Reagan, the then Secretary of Treasury, Donald Regan, wanted a republican as a fed chairman. Volker was a democrat.  Miffed, Volker named Alan Greenspan. That was mistake #1. The fed is supposed to be non-political.       

                    When Greenspan would testify before the Congress he had a special way of dealing with them. When he didn’t know the answer to a question, or if he did not want to answer it, he would talk all around it and confuse everyone. It became known as “Greenspeak”.

                    The individual who replaced Volker had to be above reproach, for he was the one banker everyone should have been able to trust.

                    However, a scandal was breaking about the bankruptcy of Long Term Management that was made up of several Nobel Laureates who would bet millions of dollars on a 1/32 change in a government bond. When the press released the names of some of the shareholders it read like a who’s who of Wall Street. The first press release had the name of the NY Fed President. All other press releases omitted his name, but the damage was done and his career at the fed would soon be over.

                    In about a year he was replaced by a boy wonder who quietly took over the job and avoided public appearances until he matured.

                    His name was Timothy Geithner. He graduated from Dartmouth College in 1983 with a B.A. in government and Asian Studies.  He studied at John Hopkins School for Advance International Studies with a M.A. in International Economics and East Asian Studies in 1985. He has studied Japanese and Chinese and has lived in East Africa, India, Thailand, China and Japan. 

                    Geithner joined the Treasury in 1988 and remained there until November 17, 2003 when he became President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. He is 43 years old and The President elect has named him to be U.S. Secretary of the Treasury. This will be the fifth administration he has worked for. It is ethics, not politics. He has been vice Chairman of the FOMC under Greenspan and Bernanke. I believe the Magician has pulled a genie out of his hat with this choice.

                    Now we have Federal Reserve Ben S. Bernanke, whose doctorate at M.I.T. was on the Great Depression: what went wrong and how to avoid it. It has become a bible for economists.     

                    I have written many times in the past that the Federal Reserve can do anything it wants to improve the economy. It has a bottomless checkbook to create or destroy money.  It can buy or sell anything financial it wants. No corporation is bigger than the Fed. They can freeze the assets of whatever and who ever it wants. The Fed Chairman can only be recalled by Congress by a ¾ vote. That means 75% of the Congress has to vote against him. Now you can understand that when Paul Volker went before Congress and stated with a grin, “I am here only as you wish, you are my boss.” It was a needle because they all knew they could not raise 75% against him. He was going to send the economy into a severe recession until prices started coming down. All the Congressmen could do was grin and bear it.

                    Now we have the most powerful financial triumvirate ever assembled to fight a global crisis.

                    The bottom line is that the Federal Reserve has taken over the Treasury Department of the United States of America.

                    The Fed is trying to liquefy our banking system so that they will issue letters of credit, which will be accepted by foreign banks and visa versa.

                    Now, one the first rulings that must be changed is to reestablish the UPTICK Rule for stock traders. July 2007 it was rescinded. Since then we have had, according to Dorsey Wright Associates, 11 days where the Dow Jones Industrials rose or declined by 5%. Prior to 2008 it has only happened 14 times since 1961.

                    If you want to measure the volatility by a 90% rule it is even worse. 90% rule is when 90% of stocks move in the same direction plus the volume has to move by 90% in the same direction. Since July ’07 we have had 33 90% down days and 14 90% up days. Talk about uneven playing fields!  EGADS Charlie Brown! Come Jan 20th when our new Magician, Barack Obama, becomes President the Fed should do something to stop this foolish and unethical trading. Traders die by the sword. Meanwhile the Fed has guaranteed deposits up to $250,000 for savings banks. US Government Money Market funds are also safe in my opinion.

                    When the three “angels” come down to fix the crisis they will come down hard and people will scream and whine as they go to financial hell.

                    When everyone is running around willy-nilly it might be wise to look to the north of us. Don’t completely throw in the towel of despair. Look to our friends – Canada. Oh Canada. They have fields of ever-lasting grain, oil and natural gas, Gold, Silver and diamonds, steel and forests of fine timber. They have everything to survive a deflationary and inflationary environment. Their markets are down along with everyone else’s, but they don’t have the foolish ghouls meandering around like ugly vampires sucking up the last drop of blood money.

    There is value up North

                    There is one company that you can investigate all by your lonesome. Newalta Income Fund, which will change from an income fund to Newalta Corp (www.newalta.com) January 1, 2009. They will be paying their last monthly distribution January 15 of 18 ½ Canadian. Then they will pay 20 cents quarterly after that. That means 5 dividend payments in 2009 for a total 981/2 cents. A six dollar price brings the yield to 16.4%. It is in the Waste Management field with a diversified business mix, they are not dependent upon one industry. The Current Ratio is a healthy 2.13 – 1. They do no have any of the funny money on their balance sheet.  Clean! Clean! Clean! They are selling at just above three times earnings.

                    Buying a stock that is already down is less risky because you have less to lose. It is better buying a sound company at 6 than buying one at 160. There is not much risk left in the stock. It is not dirt cheap – it is stupid cheap.

                    Everyone is trying to pick a market bottom, and they are relying on stock market charts that have worked in the past, but today is a new beginning and common sense will provide better rewards over the long term.

                    We have three highly educated, street-smart men that are on salary, who are on a marvelous mission to bring financial stability to our country and the world. They are risking their reputations and a positive place in history. They are holding all the cards and when they are dealt – watch out.

     

    This report has been prepared from original sources and data which we believe reliable but we make no representation to its accuracy or completeness. Coburn & Meredith Inc. its subsidiaries and or officers may from time to time acquire, hold, sell a position discussed in this publications, and we may act as principal for our own account or as agent for both the buyer and seller.